Basham et al v. American National County Mutual Ins Co et al
Filing
325
ORDER granting 324 Stipulation for Dismissal(s); See order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on June 17, 2015. (cnn) Modified on 6/17/2015 to correct document link (cnn).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
EDDIE BASHAM, as Administrator
of the Estate of James Basham, and
FREDA MCCLENDON, Individually
and as Class Representatives on Behalf
of All Similarly Situated Persons
V.
PLAINTIFFS
CASE NO. 4:12-CV-04005
AMERICAN NATIONAL COUNTY
MUTUAL INS. CO., et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
On March 10, 2015, the Court entered multiple Orders dismissing all but two
Defendants in this case. (ECF Nos. 297-306). The dismissals were without prejudice. The only
two Defendants with claims remaining against them are American National Property and
Casualty Company and Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Company. These remaining
Defendants, along with the previously dismissed Defendants, have now filed stipulations of
dismissal that address Plaintiffs’ surviving claims and/or stipulate that the previous dismissals
should be with prejudice. (ECF Nos. 318-324). The Court will address each stipulation in turn.
By prior order of the Court (ECF No. 305), all claims asserted against the Met P&C
Defendants 1, other than the claims of Plaintiff Freda McClendon against Metropolitan Group
Property and Casualty Insurance Company, were dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to the
stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 320), that prior order of dismissal is hereby amended as
1
The Met P&C Defendants are: Metlife Auto & Home, Metlife Auto & Home Group, Metropolitan Casualty
Insurance Company, Metropolitan Direct P & C Insurance Company, Metropolitan General Insurance Company,
Metropolitan Group Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas,
and Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company.
follows:
all claims asserted against the Met P&C Defendants in this action are hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
This dismissal includes Plaintiff Freda McClendon’s remaining claims against Metropolitan
Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company.
By prior orders of the Court (ECF Nos. 299 & 303), all claims asserted against the
ANPAC Defendants 2, other than the claims of Plaintiff Eddie Basham against American
National Property and Casualty Company, were dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to the
stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 319), those prior orders of dismissal are hereby amended as
follows:
all claims asserted against the ANPAC Defendants in this action are hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
This dismissal includes Plaintiff Eddie Basham’s remaining claims against American National
Property and Casualty Company.
By prior order of the Court (ECF No. 306), all claims asserted against the Travelers
Defendants 3 were dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (ECF
No. 318), that prior order of dismissal is hereby amended as follows: all claims asserted against
2
The ANPAC Defendants are American National Property & Casualty Company, American National General
Insurance Company, American National County Mutual Insurance Company, ANPAC Louisiana Insurance
Company, and Pacific Property & Casualty Company.
3
The Travelers Defendants are: St. Paul Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance
Company, St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company, St. Paul Medical Liability Insurance Company, St. Paul Mercury
Insurance Company, St. Paul Protective Insurance Company, St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company, TravCo
Insurance Company, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. (the successor in interest to Travelers Auto
Insurance Co. of New Jersey, and also misnamed in the complaint as Travelers of New Jersey Group), Travelers
Casualty and Surety Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Travelers Casualty Company
of Connecticut, Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America, Travelers Commercial Casualty Company,
Travelers Commercial Insurance Company, The Travelers Companies, Inc. (formerly known as The St. Paul
Travelers Companies, Inc., and also misnamed in the complaint as St. Paul Travelers Group, and St. Paul Travelers
Insurance Companies), Travelers Excess and Surplus Lines Company, The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance
Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company of America, The Travelers
Indemnity Company of Connecticut, The Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company, Travelers Lloyds of Texas
Insurance Company, Travelers Personal Insurance Company, Travelers Personal Security Insurance Company,
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company, and Travelers
Property Casualty Corporation.
the Travelers Defendants in this action are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with
each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
By prior order of the Court (ECF No. 301), all claims asserted against Farm Bureau
Property & Casualty Insurance Company were dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to the
stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 321), that prior order of dismissal is hereby amended as
follows: all claims asserted against Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Insurance Company in
this action are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each side to bear its own costs
and attorneys’ fees.
By prior orders of the Court (ECF Nos. 298 & 302), all claims asserted against the 21st
Century Defendants 4 were dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties
(ECF No. 322), those prior orders of dismissal are hereby amended as follows: all claims
asserted against the 21st Century Defendants in this action are hereby DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE, with each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
By prior order of the Court (ECF No. 300), all claims asserted against the Erie
Defendants 5 were dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (ECF
No. 323), that prior order of dismissal is hereby amended as follows: all claims asserted against
the Erie Defendants in this action are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each side
to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
4
The 21st Century Defendants are 21st Century Casualty Company, 21st Century Insurance Company, 21st Century
Insurance Company of the Southwest, 21st Century Insurance Group, 21st North America Insurance Company, and
21st Century Centennial Company.
5
The Erie Defendants are Erie Insurance Company; Erie Insurance Company of New York, Erie Insurance
Exchange; Erie Insurance Group; Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Company; and Erie Indemnity Company.
By prior order of the Court (ECF No. 304), all claims asserted against the Infinity
Defendants 6 were dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (ECF
No. 324), that prior order of dismissal is hereby amended as follows: all claims asserted against
the Infinity Defendants in this action are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each
side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 17th day of June, 2015.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
6
The Infinity Defendants are: Infinity Assurance Insurance Co., Infinity Auto Insurance Co., Infinity Casualty
Insurance Co., Infinity General Insurance Co., Infinity Indemnity Insurance Co., Infinity Insurance Co., Infinity
National Insurance Co., Infinity Preferred Insurance Co., Infinity Premier Insurance Co., Infinity Property &
Casualty Corp., Infinity Property & Casualty Group, Infinity Reserve Insurance Co., Infinity Safeguard Insurance
Co., Infinity Security Insurance Co., Infinity Select Insurance Co., Infinity Specialty Insurance Co., Infinity
Standard Insurance Co.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?