Moss et al v. United States of America

Filing 36

ORDER staying Plaintiffs' response time re 31 MOTION to Dismiss until further notice from the Court. See Order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on July 15, 2014. (mll)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
SWAN B. MOSS, III, et al.

VS.

PLAINTIFFS

CONSOLIDATED ACTION
CASE NO. 12-CV-4030

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEFENDANT
ORDER

Plaintiffs’ filed a Motion to Defer Time for Filing Their Response to the Defendant United
States’ Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. ECF No. 35. The
Court has granted Plaintiffs the opportunity to conduct limited discovery related to subject matter
jurisdiction. Plaintiffs estimate that the discovery will not be completed until October or November
of this year. Thus, Plaintiffs move the Court to enter an order providing that the time for Plaintiffs’
response to the United States’ Renewed Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31) be deferred and held in
abeyance pending completion of the limited discovery allowed by the Court. The United States has
indicated to the Court that it wishes to file a response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Defer Time for Filing
Their Response. Accordingly, the United States has until July 25, 2014, to respond to Plaintiffs’
motion. Because Plaintiffs’ response to the Renewed Motion to Dismiss is technically due on July
16, 2014, Plaintiffs’ response time is stayed until further notice from the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 15th day of July, 2014.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge