Cottrell v. Duke et al

Filing 82

ORDER re 78 MOTION for Order Entry of Initial Scheduling Order and 79 MOTION to Stay and For Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant's time to answer or otherwise respond to the operative complaint is ext ended until the Court rules on the pending motions. Once the Court rules on the pending motions, 78 and 79 , it will set a specific date by which Defendant must file its answer. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 16, 2014. (mll) Modified on 1/17/2014 to edit text. (mll)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
____________________________________
)
IN RE WAL-MART STORES, INC.
)
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
)
LITIGATION
)
____________________________________)
)
This Document Relates to:
)
ALL ACTIONS
)
____________________________________)

Master Docket No. 4:12-cv-4041

ORDER
The purpose of this order is to address the deadline for Defendant to file its answer in this
case. Presently pending before the Court is a Motion for Entry of Initial Scheduling Order filed
by Plaintiffs (ECF No. 78) and a Motion for a Limited Stay of this Action filed by Defendant
(ECF No. 79). Defendant’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the operative complaint is
extended until the Court rules on the pending motions mentioned above. Once the Court rules on
the pending motions, it will set a specific date by which Defendant must file its answer.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 16th day of January, 2014.

/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge