White v. Stovall et al

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 13 Report and Recommendations; denying 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; further finding that the Complaint should be and hereby is DISMISSED. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on May 2, 2013. (cap)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ERIC . WHITE vs. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 12-CV-4061 SHERIFF RON STOVALL and ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed March 29, 2013, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 13). Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff’s First Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4) and Second Motion for Leave to Appear in forma pauperis (ECF No. 10) be DENIED and the Complaint be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(I-iii) and 1915A(a). Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s First Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4) and Second Motion for Leave to Appear in forma pauperis (ECF No. 10) should be and hereby is DENIED. The Court further finds that the Complaint should be and hereby is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of May, 2013. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?