White v. Stovall et al
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 13 Report and Recommendations; denying 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; further finding that the Complaint should be and hereby is DISMISSED. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on May 2, 2013. (cap)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
ERIC . WHITE
vs.
PLAINTIFF
Civil No. 12-CV-4061
SHERIFF RON STOVALL and
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed March 29, 2013, by the Honorable
Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No.
13). Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff’s First Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis
(ECF No. 4) and Second Motion for Leave to Appear in forma pauperis (ECF No. 10) be DENIED
and the Complaint be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(I-iii) and 1915A(a).
Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has
passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation
in toto. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s First Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma
pauperis (ECF No. 4) and Second Motion for Leave to Appear in forma pauperis (ECF No. 10)
should be and hereby is DENIED. The Court further finds that the Complaint should be and hereby
is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of May, 2013.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?