Morrison v. Brazell et al

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 Report and Recommendations; denying 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii) and 1915A(a). Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on April 8, 2013. (cap)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION COTY JAMES MORRISON V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:12-cv-4084 WARDEN MARTY BRAZELL; and CAPTAIN STEVE HARTLINE DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed March 19, 2013 by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 11). Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that his Amended Complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 6) is hereby DENIED and Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 5) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii) and 1915A(a). IT IS SO ORDERED, this 8th day of April, 2013. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?