Toledano v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company et al
ORDER granting 25 Motion in Limine. See Order for Specifics. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on August 22, 2014. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CASE NO. 4:12-CV-4135
SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY; SHELTER GENERAL
INSURANCE COMPANY; and
SHELTER INSURANCE COMPANIES
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion in Limine. (ECF No. 25). Plaintiff has filed a
response to the motion. (ECF No. 28). The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. The
motion will be granted. Defendants request that the Court instruct Plaintiff to refrain from
referencing the following at trial:
1. Offering evidence, or creating a negative inference that Plaintiff has not been arrested,
indicted, or convicted concerning the subject incident. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. See
Warren v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 3:05 CV 260, 2007 WL 158741 at *2 (E.D. Ark. Jan. 17,
2007) (“‘As a general rule, evidence that criminal charges were not brought is inadmissible in a civil
case arising out of the same events as the criminal charges.’”).
2. Using disparaging or prejudicial language regarding Shelter. Defendants’ motion is
GRANTED. However, what constitutes overly prejudicial language will have to be determined on
a case by case basis at trial.
3. Introducing any evidence of Plaintiff’s character or reputation to bolster his credibility.
Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. Federal Rule of Evidence 404(a) provides that evidence of
character as a general matter “is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person
acted in accordance with the character or trait.” Accordingly, Plaintiff may not offer character
evidence for the purpose of bolstering his credibility or proving that he acted in accordance with his
good character. However, Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)(2) provides for limited exceptions
regarding the admission of character evidence. Without any information regarding what character
evidence Plaintiff might submit, the Court cannot rule on its admissibility pursuant to Rule 404(b).
Accordingly, the door is still open for Plaintiff to show that his character evidence falls under the
one of Rule 404(b)’s exceptions.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 22nd day of August, 2014.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?