Hall v. United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas, Texarkana Division et al
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 ; Case dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on August 13, 2013. (mll)
Hall v. United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas, Texarkana Division et al
Doc. 8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
LEMUEL R. HALL
VS.
PLAINTIFF
Civil No. 4:12-cv-4145
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS;
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY;
VETERAN’S ADMINISTRATION; and
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed July 25, 2013, by the Honorable Barry
A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 7). After
conducting pre-service screening of the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), Judge Bryant
recommends that the above-styled case be dismissed with prejudice. Judge Bryant also recommends that
no further in forma pauperis filings from Plaintiff be accepted by the Clerk until Plaintiff has received
permission from the Court to submit the filings.
The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object
has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation
in toto. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk should not file any future
in forma pauperis pleadings until the Court has had the opportunity to review the documents and
determine whether they should be filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 13th day of August, 2013.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?