Thomason v. Randall et al

Filing 113

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 89 Second Motion for Summary Judgment. (See Order for specifics.) Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 21, 2015. (mll)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
SCOTT THOMASON
V.

PLAINTIFF
NO. 4:12-CV-4155

STEVE RANDALL,
WARREN HANSON,
STEVE FALER,
SWS ENGRAVING, L.L.C, and
AMERICAN LEGACY FIREARMS, INC.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 43 & 89).
Defendants move to dismiss all claims against them contending that Scott Thomason lacks
standing to bring these claims in his individual capacity, there was no contract between the
parties, and if there was a contract, the Defendants did not breach the agreement. Plaintiff has
responded. (ECF Nos. 52 & 95). Defendants have replied. (ECF No. 72). Plaintiff has filed a
Sur-Reply. (ECF No. 73). The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration.
For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion, the Court finds that Defendants’
Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 43 & 89) should be and hereby are GRANTED IN
PART and DENIED IN PART. Thomason’s implied contract, promissory estoppel, and fraud
claims remain. His breach of contract, piercing the corporate veil, interference with contractual
relationship or business expectancy, civil conspiracy, and unjust enrichment claims are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 21st day of January, 2015.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge