Lewis v. Haltom
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Complaint is Dismissed. The Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 6, 2014. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
DON EARL LEWIS
CASE NO. 13-CV-4002
CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 25, 2013, by the Honorable
Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 8).
Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) be DISMISSED pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(I-iii) and 1915A(a). Plaintiff has responded with timely objections (ECF
In his objections, Plaintiff merely offers more details about his history with Judge Haltom
and again accuses Judge Haltom of bias against him during criminal proceedings. The Court,
however, agrees with Judge Bryant’s decision that Judge Haltom is entitled to absolute immunity
for all judicial actions not taken in complete absence of all jurisdiction. See Penn v. U.S., 335 F.3d
786, 789 (8th Cir. 2003); Robinson v. Freeze, 15 F.3d 107, 108 (8th Cir. 1994). Plaintiff has made
no accusation that Judge Haltom acted outside his jurisdiction or in a nonjudicial capacity. The
Court, therefore, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that Plaintiff’s objections offer neither
law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and Recommendation. After reviewing the record
de novo, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§
1915(e)(2)(B)(I-iii) and 1915A(a). The dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g), and the Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 6th day of January, 2014.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?