Todd v. Ross et al

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's conditions of confinement claim; grievance claim and all official capacity claims are dismissed. Defendants Aimes and Johnson are dismissed from this action. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on July 22, 2013. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION MICHAEL TODD VS. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 4:13-cv-4044 HEATH ROSS; SIMONE AIMS; OFFICER JOHNSON; SERGEANT ZUMWALT; and CAPTAIN GODBOLT DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 13, 2013, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 8). Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff’s conditions of confinement claim; grievance claim; and all official capacity claims be dismissed. Judge Bryant further recommends that Aimes and Johnson be dismissed from this case. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Plaintiff’s conditions of confinement claim; grievance claim; and all official capacity claims are DISMISSED. Accordingly, both Aimes and Johnson are dismissed from this action. This leaves for later resolution Plaintiff’s due process claims against Heath Ross, Sgt. Zumwalt, and Captain Godbolt in their individual capacities. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 22nd day of July, 2013. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge 1 The Report and Recommendation was returned as undeliverable on June 20, 2013. On July 1, 2013, Judge Bryant ordered that the Report and Recommendation be re-sent to a new address that was obtained by the Court. There has been no further notice that the Report and Recommendation sent on July 1 was undeliverable.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?