Cherry v. Southern Refrigerated Transport

Filing 28

ORDER denying 26 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on September 8, 2014. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION RONALD CHERRY vs. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:13-cv-04095 SOUTHERN REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT DEFENDANT ORDER BEFORE the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider. ECF No. 26. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), United States District Judge Susan O. Hickey referred the Motion to the undersigned for decision. This matter is ready for decision. 1. Background: On October 15, 2013, Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint against Defendant alleging discrimination based on race and color. ECF No. 1. On August 15, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Reconsider. ECF No. 26. With this Motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider the Initial Scheduling Order and allow him to submit his documents to the Clerk for filing. Also, Plaintiff requests the Clerk forward any documents from Defendant to Plaintiff. Id. 2. Discussion: Pursuant to the Pro Se Manual for litigants, which has been provided to Plaintiff, Plaintiff is allowed to file his documents by delivering them to the Clerk for filing. Also, the Clerk is not required to provide Plaintiff with filings from Defendant. It is the duty of the Defendant to provide -1- copies of filings to Plaintiff. If not already doing so, Defendant shall mail a copy of any documents filed to Plaintiff at the address provided by Plaintiff to the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 26) is DENIED. DATED this 8th day of September, 2014. /s/ Barry A. Bryant HON. BARRY A. BRYANT U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?