Cherry v. Southern Refrigerated Transport
ORDER denying 46 Motion to Compel. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on February 3, 2015. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Case No. 4:13-cv-04095
Before the Court is a Motion to Compel Discovery filed by Plaintiff. ECF No. 46. Pursuant
to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3) (2009), the Honorable Susan O. Hickey referred
this Motion to this Court. After considering this Motion, the Court finds it should be DENIED
because Plaintiff did not comply with Local Rule 7.2(g) prior to filing this Motion.
Local Rule 7.2(g) requires “[a]ll motions to compel discovery and all other discoveryenforcement motions and all motions for protective orders shall contain a statement by the moving
party that the parties have conferred in good faith on the specific issue or issues in dispute and that
they are not able to resolve their disagreements without the intervention of the Court.” (emphasis
added). Local Rule 7.2(g) further provides the following: “If any such motion lacks such a
statement, that motion may be dismissed summarily for failure to comply with this rule.” Plaintiff's
motion lacks this statement and it appears Plaintiff has made no attempt to resolve the discovery
issues in dispute prior to this Motion being filed.
Accordingly, because Plaintiff did not comply with Local Rule 7.2(g) prior to filing his
Motion, this Motion (ECF No. 46) is DENIED without prejudice to refiling upon Plaintiff’s
compliance with the local rules of this court.
Further, all Parties are directed to comply with Local Rule 7.2(g) and meet and confer, either
in person or by phone prior to filing any future motion to compel discovery, discovery-enforcement
motion, or motion for protective order. Any future violation of Rule 7.2(g) may result in
sanctions being imposed.
ENTERED this 3rd day of February 2015.
/s/ Barry A. Bryant
HON. BARRY A. BRYANT
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?