Solomon v. Sanders et al
ORDER denying as moot 33 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on January 27, 2015. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CLIFTON O. SOLOMON
Civil No. 4:13-cv-04126
CORPORAL ALLEN SANDERS;
and DEWAYNE FLOYD
Plaintiff filed this section 1983 action on December 30, 2013. Plaintiff proceeds pro se and
in forma pauperis. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 33.
In their Motion to Dismiss, Defendants argue that this case should be dismissed for
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Specifically, Defendants state they have been
unable to effect service of Defendants’ Answers to Interrogatories and Responses to Request for
Production on Plaintiff because he failed to keep Defendants and the Court apprised of his current
Since Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff has been in contact with the Court,
his address is current and accurate, and Plaintiff is actively prosecuting this case. Therefore, I find
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss moot. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 33)
is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of January 2015.
/s/ Barry A. Bryant
HON. BARRY A. BRYANT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?