Dennington v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al

Filing 227

ORDER granting 223 Motion to Seal Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 25, 2019. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION JAMES STUART and CAREDA L. HOOD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 4:14-cv-4001 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to File Under Seal. (ECF No. 223). The Court finds that no response is required and that the matter is ripe for consideration. On April 2, 2015, the Court entered a Stipulated Protective Order. (ECF No. 62). Pursuant to the Order, documents produced and information disclosed at a deposition in this action may be designated as “Confidential,” and any papers filed with the Court that include “Confidential” information must be filed under seal. Defendant has designated as “Confidential” certain documents and deposition testimony addressing, inter alia, insureds’ personal information, adjusting practices, and other competitively sensitive business information. In support of their motion for summary judgment, Plaintiffs intend to discuss, cite, and attach as exhibits a number of “Confidential” documents. To that end, Plaintiffs request leave to redact their motion, brief, and accompanying exhibits, and to provide the Court with unredacted copies of the same. Due to this, the Court construes the instant motion as a Motion to Redact. The Court understands that some portions of the motion, brief, and exhibits contain public information that is not covered by the Protective Order, which may be filed on the docket. Because the motion, brief, and exhibits can be redacted, it is in the best interests of the public for redacted versions to be filed on the docket. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (ECF No. 223) should be and hereby is GRANTED. The Court notes that Plaintiffs have already filed redacted versions of their motion, brief, and exhibits on the docket and have provided the Court with unredacted copies of the same. Thus, no further action is necessary regarding this issue. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 25th day of September, 2019. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?