Dennington v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al

Filing 251

ORDER denying 170 Motion for Discovery; denying 212 Motion to Compel ; denying 224 Motion for Summary Judgment. Motions denied without prejudice to the parties' right to renew them in the future if necessary. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 3, 2020. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION JAMES STUART and CAREDA L. HOOD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 4:14-cv-4001 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER The parties have reached a proposed settlement of all matters related to this case. The Court has preliminarily approved of the parties’ proposed settlement, certified a class for settlement purposes only, and set a final approval hearing. Several motions unrelated to the proposed settlement remain pending in this case. In light of the case’s current posture, the Court finds that those motions are moot and should be denied. See Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254, (1936) (noting “the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants”). Accordingly, all currently pending motions in this case (ECF Nos. 170, 212, 224) are hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the parties’ right to renew them in the future if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of January, 2020. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?