Willis et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
ORDER granting 24 Motion to Withdraw Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, denying 28 MOTION for Leave to File a Reply Instanter. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 24, 2014. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
GEORGE WILLIS and AUDREY WILLIS,
Individually and on behalf of those similarly
CASE NO. 14-CV-4024
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY and NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE
INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a NATIONWIDE
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Withdraw Memorandum in Support of Motion
to Dismiss. (ECF No. 24). Plaintiffs have filed responses in opposition to the motion. (ECF Nos.
26-27).1 Defendants request that they be permitted to withdraw their memorandum brief (ECF No.
15) in support of their Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 14). Defendants state that there were a few
unintentional errors in their brief relating to the definition of “Released Claims” in Alexander v.
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, et al., Case No. CV-2009-120-3 (Ark. Cir. Ct. 2009).
Defendants request that they be permitted to file a new brief to correct the definition and conform
their arguments to the accurate definition.
Upon consideration, the Court finds that good cause for the motion (ECF No. 24) has been
shown. Accordingly, the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. The clerk is directed to
Defendants have also filed a Motion for Leave to File a Reply. (ECF No. 28). The Court does
not find a reply necessary. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.
disregard Defendants’ memorandum brief. (ECF No. 15). Defendants must file their corrected brief
in support of their Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14) on or before March 25, 2014. Plaintiffs’
response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is due on or before April 8, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 24th day of March, 2014.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?