Holt v. Ford Motor Company
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Stay. If the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, Plaintiff must respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the order denying remand. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 17, 2014. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
KEVIN HOLT, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated
Civil No. 4:14-cv-4030
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 18). Specifically,
Plaintiff moves the Court to enter an order staying this litigation and extending the deadline to
respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) until the Court rules on
Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. Upon consideration, the Court finds that good cause for an
extension has been shown. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion should be and
hereby is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The case is not stayed. However,
the Court extends the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary
If the Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, Plaintiff must respond to
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the order
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 17th day of March, 2014.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?