Holt v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 23

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Stay. If the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, Plaintiff must respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the order denying remand. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 17, 2014. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION KEVIN HOLT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated V. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 4:14-cv-4030 FORD MOTOR COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 18). Specifically, Plaintiff moves the Court to enter an order staying this litigation and extending the deadline to respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) until the Court rules on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. Upon consideration, the Court finds that good cause for an extension has been shown. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion should be and hereby is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The case is not stayed. However, the Court extends the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. If the Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, Plaintiff must respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the order denying remand. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 17th day of March, 2014. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?