Holt v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 23

ORDER granting in part and denying in part #18 Motion to Stay. If the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, Plaintiff must respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the order denying remand. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 17, 2014. (mll)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION

KEVIN HOLT, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated

V.

PLAINTIFF

Civil No. 4:14-cv-4030

FORD MOTOR COMPANY

DEFENDANT

ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 18). Specifically,
Plaintiff moves the Court to enter an order staying this litigation and extending the deadline to
respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) until the Court rules on
Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. Upon consideration, the Court finds that good cause for an
extension has been shown. Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion should be and
hereby is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The case is not stayed. However,
the Court extends the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment.

If the Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, Plaintiff must respond to

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment within fourteen (14) days of the entry of the order
denying remand.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 17th day of March, 2014.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge