Chesshir et al v. LaJoie Ventures, L.P. et al

Filing 45

JUDGMENT granting 44 Motion to Dismiss. Case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to terms of settlement agreement. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on July 1, 2015. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION MICHAEL CHESSHIR; and JENNIFER CHESSHIR v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 4:14-cv-04140 BRADLEY TAYLOR d/b/a TAYLOR & TAYLOR DEVELOPMENT, LLC; MOLLY TAYLOR d/b/a TAYLOR & TAYLOR DEVELOPMENT, LLC; JANELLE WHITE d/b/a TAYLOR & TAYLOR DEVELOPMENT, LLC; TAYLOR & TAYLOR DEVELOPMENT, LLC; BRADLEY TAYLOR; MOLLY TAYLOR; and JANELLE WHITE DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Before the Court is a Joint Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice. (ECF No. 44). The parties have informed the Court that they have settled this case, and the motion is filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above styled cause be, and is hereby, dismissed with prejudice subject to the terms of the settlement agreement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if any party desires that the terms of settlement be a part of the record therein, those terms should be reduced to writing and filed with the court within thirty (30) days of the entry of this judgment. The court retains jurisdiction to vacate this order and reopen this action to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. Dated this 1st day of July, 2015. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?