Chesshir et al v. LaJoie Ventures, L.P. et al
Filing
45
JUDGMENT granting 44 Motion to Dismiss. Case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to terms of settlement agreement. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on July 1, 2015. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
MICHAEL CHESSHIR; and
JENNIFER CHESSHIR
v.
PLAINTIFFS
Case No. 4:14-cv-04140
BRADLEY TAYLOR d/b/a TAYLOR &
TAYLOR DEVELOPMENT, LLC;
MOLLY TAYLOR d/b/a TAYLOR &
TAYLOR DEVELOPMENT, LLC;
JANELLE WHITE d/b/a TAYLOR &
TAYLOR DEVELOPMENT, LLC;
TAYLOR & TAYLOR DEVELOPMENT,
LLC; BRADLEY TAYLOR; MOLLY
TAYLOR; and JANELLE WHITE
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
Before the Court is a Joint Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice. (ECF No. 44). The parties have
informed the Court that they have settled this case, and the motion is filed pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above styled
cause be, and is hereby, dismissed with prejudice subject to the terms of the settlement agreement.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if any party desires that the terms of settlement be a part
of the record therein, those terms should be reduced to writing and filed with the court within thirty
(30) days of the entry of this judgment. The court retains jurisdiction to vacate this order and reopen
this action to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement.
Dated this 1st day of July, 2015.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?