Golston v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Filing 15

JUDGMENT adopting Report and Recommendations re 14 ; granting 11 Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $4,312.20 pursuant to the EAJA. This amount should be paid in addition to, and not out of, any past due benefits which plaintiff may be awarded in the future. Further, any EAJA award by this Court should be made payable to plaintiff and not counsel. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on April 26, 2016. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION DEMETRIUS S.GOLSTON on behalf of R.D.G., A MINOR vs. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 4:15-cv-04009 CAROLYN COLVIN Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed April 5, 2016 by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 14. Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) be GRANTED. Defendant has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is adopted in toto. Plaintiff is entitled to compensation under the EAJA in the amount of $4,312.20. This award represents 21.20 attorney hours at an hourly rate of $187.00 for work performed in 2015 and 1.85 attorney hours at an hourly rate of $188.00 for work performed in 2015. This amount should be paid in addition to, and not out of, any past due benefits which Plaintiff may be awarded in the future. The parties are reminded that the award herein under the EAJA will be taken into account at such time as a reasonable fee is determined pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406 in order to prevent double recovery by counsel for Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 26th day of April, 2016. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?