Tiller v. McAllester et al
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 ; granting 9 and 21 Motion(s) to Dismiss; separate defendants Deputy Director Bradshaw, Sergeant Brenda McAllester and Britney Carter are dismissed. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 22, 2015. (cnn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
JOSHUA TILLER
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 4:15-cv-04040
SERGEANT McALLESTER, Southwest Arkansas
Community Correction Center, R. WISE, Health
Service Administrator, Correct Care Solutions;
JERRY BRADSHAW, Deputy Director, Arkansas
Community Correction; BRITNEY CARTER,
Administrative Specialist, Arkansas Community
Correction; JANET MYERS, Correct Case Solutions;
DR. VEIGEAS, Correct Case Solutions; CONNY MASON,
Correct Case Solutions; and DR. McALISTER,
Correct Case Solutions
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed September 3, 2015, by the
Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(ECF No. 23). Judge Bryant recommends the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) filed by Defendants
Deputy Director Bradshaw and Sergeant Brenda McAllester and the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21)
filed by Defendant Britney Carter be granted.
The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object
has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto.
Accordingly, the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Bradshaw, McAllester, and Carter (ECF No.
9 & 21) are hereby GRANTED. All claims against these Defendants are dismissed. Plaintiff’s claims
against Defendants R. Wise, Janet Myers, Dr. Veigeas, Conny Mason, and Dr. McAlister will proceed..
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 22nd day of September, 2015.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?