Richardson v. City of Bradley, Arkansas et al

Filing 22

ORDER granting 21 Motion to Dismiss Case. Parties settled, case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to terms of settlement agreement. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on June 27, 2016. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION MARVIN RICHARDSON v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:15-cv-04077 CITY OF BRADLEY, ARKANSAS; KATARINA M. SALIC, individually and in her official capacity as former Chief of Police for the Cit of Bradley, Arkansas; ALLISON BRIDGES, individually and in her official capacity as a police officer with and for the City of Bradley, Arkansas; JOHN DOES #1-5, individually and in their official capacities as employees of the City of Bradley, Arkansas DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 21). The parties have reached a settlement in this matter. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), an action may be dismissed by a Court order on terms that the Court considers proper. Accordingly, the Court finds that the above styled case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE subject to the terms of the settlement agreement. If any party desires that the terms of settlement be a part of the record therein, those terms should be reduced to writing and filed with the court within thirty (30) days of the entry of this judgment. The court retains jurisdiction to vacate this order and to reopen this action upon cause shown that the settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 27th day of June, 2016. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?