Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. v. Thoroughbred Direct Intermodal Services, Inc.
Filing
43
ORDER granting 42 Motion to Dismiss. Case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to terms of settlement agreement. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on August 8, 2017. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
SOUTHERN REFRIGERATED
TRANSPORT, INC.
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 4:15-cv-4078
THOROUGHBRED DIRECT
INTERMODAL SERVICES, INC.
DEFENDANT
THOROUGHBRED DIRECT
INTERMODAL SERVICES, INC.
THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF
v.
EAGLE SYSTEMS, INC.
THIRD- PARTY DEFENDANT
ORDER
Before the Court is the Joint Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 42) filed by Plaintiff Southern
Refrigerated Transport, Inc.; Defendant Thoroughbred Direct Intermodal Services, Inc.; and ThirdParty Defendant Eagle Systems, Inc. The parties have reached a settlement in this matter and request
that all claims be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own fees, costs, and expenses.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), an action may be dismissed by court order at the
plaintiff’s request, on terms the court considers proper.
Accordingly, the parties’ joint motion (ECF No. 42) is hereby GRANTED. All claims in this
matter are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, subject to the terms of the settlement
agreement. Each party shall bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. If any party desires that the terms
of settlement be a part of the record therein, those terms should be reduced to writing and filed with
the Court within thirty (30) days of the entry of this judgment. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate
this Order and to reopen this action upon cause shown that the settlement has not been completed and
further litigation is necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 8th day of August, 2017.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?