Lewis v. Singleton et al

Filing 28

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 25 ; Defendants Singleton and Dennis terminated. Plaintiff's denial of medical care claim against Defendant Bland remains. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on August 9, 2016. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ZACHERY LEWIS VS. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 15-CV-4086 JAMES SINGLETON; ORLANDO DENNIS; and CECILIA BLAND DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 1, 2016, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 25). Judge Bryant recommends that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20) be granted in part and denied in part. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).1 Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20) is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is granted with respect to all claims against Defendant Singleton and the claim of excessive force against Defendants Dennis and Bland. These claims are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is denied as to the denial of medical care claim against Defendant Bland. The only claim remaining in this case is Plaintiff’s denial of medical care claim against Defendant Bland. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 9th day of August, 2016. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge 1 On June 30, 2016, after the time to file objections had passed, Plaintiff requested an extension of time to file objections. (ECF No. 26). The motion was granted and Plaintiff was given until July 25, 2016 to file objections. (ECF No. 27). To date, no objections have been filed.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?