Lewis v. Singleton et al
Filing
28
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 25 ; Defendants Singleton and Dennis terminated. Plaintiff's denial of medical care claim against Defendant Bland remains. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on August 9, 2016. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
ZACHERY LEWIS
VS.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 15-CV-4086
JAMES SINGLETON;
ORLANDO DENNIS; and
CECILIA BLAND
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed June 1, 2016, by the Honorable Barry
A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 25). Judge
Bryant recommends that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20) be granted in part
and denied in part. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the
time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).1 Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and
Recommendation in toto.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20) is hereby
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is granted with respect to all claims against
Defendant Singleton and the claim of excessive force against Defendants Dennis and Bland. These
claims are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is denied as to the denial of medical care claim against
Defendant Bland. The only claim remaining in this case is Plaintiff’s denial of medical care claim
against Defendant Bland.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 9th day of August, 2016.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
1
On June 30, 2016, after the time to file objections had passed, Plaintiff requested an extension
of time to file objections. (ECF No. 26). The motion was granted and Plaintiff was given until July 25,
2016 to file objections. (ECF No. 27). To date, no objections have been filed.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?