Deloney et al v. Chase et al
ORDER denying 34 Supplemental MOTION for Default Judgment. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 11, 2017. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JERRY DELONEY and
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-4104
DENNIS CHASE and
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Second Supplemental Motion for Default Judgment as to
Defendants Dennis Chase and Chasemaster Corporation. ECF No. 34. Plaintiffs again seek
recovery under theories of promissory estoppel, unjust enrichment/assumpsit, and conversion in
the alternative, but seek redress under theories of breach of fiduciary duty and fraud “[i]n addition
to Plaintiffs’ other claims.” Regardless, the Court has considered these claims and finds that
Plaintiffs have not adequately supported their claims of breach of fiduciary duty or fraud.
Therefore, because the Court has granted relief on Plaintiffs’ breach-of-contract claim and
Plaintiffs have failed to sufficiently support their breach of fiduciary duty and fraud claims, the
Court finds that Plaintiffs’ Second Supplemental Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendants
Dennis Chase and Chasemaster Corporation (ECF No. 34) should be and hereby is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 11th day of September, 2017.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?