Sorrell Holdings LLC v. Infinity Headwear & Apparel, LLC

Filing 63

ORDER denying 59 Motion for Reconsideration and providing the Court's interpretation of "figurative handle." Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on November 30, 2018. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION SORRELL HOLDINGS, LLC PLAINTIFF vs. Case No. 4:16-cv-04019 INFINITY HEADWEAR &APPAREL, LLC DEFENDANT ORDER Plaintiff, Sorrell Holdings, LLC , filed a Motion for Clarification and Reconsideration of the Court's Claim Construction Order. ECF No. 59. Defendant, Infinity Headwear & Apparel, LLC, filed its response. ECF No. 62. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including conducting the trial, ordering the entry of a final judgment, and conducting all post-judgment proceedings. ECF No. 33. The Court having reviewed the pleadings finds as follows: Plaintiff requests clarification of the of the Court's construction of "figurative handle" due to an inconsistency between the construction contained in the Order (ECF No. 57, Pg.9) as compared to language used in Exhibit B to the order. (ECF No. 57, Pg. 14). To be clear, the Court construes "figurative handle" to mean "a figure, resemblance, or likeness which is designed especially to be grasped by the hand." Further, Plaintiff's request for reconsideration of the Court's construction of "figurative handle" and "cinch" is DENIED. DATED this 30th day of November 2018. Barry A. Bryant /s/ HON. BARRY A. BRYANT U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?