Mendoza v. Wise et al

Filing 15

ORDER denying 14 Motion for Service. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on July 26, 2016. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION SANTOS MENDOZA A/K/A SANTOS GERARDO MENDOZA CASTELLON v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 4:16-cv-04029 BOOKING OFFICER JONES; LIEUTENANT HEATH ROSS; CAPTAIN GODBOLT; JAILER TORPLER; JAILER BLAND; JAILER FINCHER; JAILER MILLS; JAILER STACY; JAILER MALONE; JAILER ROBINSON; JAILER HINSON; JAILER MCCMORES; SERGEANT CATO; COMMISSARY WORKER MAYS; and BOOKING STAFF PINDERGRASS DEFENDANTS ORDER This is a civil rights action filed by the Plaintiff, Santos Mendoza, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Service. ECF No. 14. Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint on July 18, 2016. ECF No. 13. Prior to serving the named Defendants, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the Court to determine whether the causes of action stated in Plaintiff’s complaint (1) are frivolous or malicious, (2) fail to state claims upon which relief may be granted, or (3) seek monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915(A). Plaintiff’s motion is therefore premature. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Service (ECF No. 14) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of July, 2016. /s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE     

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?