Canopius Capital Two Limited et al v. Jeanne Estates Apartments, Inc. et al

Filing 44

ORDER granting 43 Motion to Dismiss. Parties settled, case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to terms of settlement agreement. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on August 30, 2017. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION CANOPIUS CAPITAL TWO LIMITED; CANOPIUS US INSURANCE, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS OMEGA US INSURANCE, INC.; ATRIUM 5 LIMITED; AMERICAN MODERN SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY; and AMERICAN WESTERN HOME INSURANCE v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 4:16-cv-4032 JEANNE ESTATES APARTMENTS, INC.; STEVE JOHNSON; and DON WOLF DEFENDANT-INSUREDS and TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY HOLINESS TABERNACLE CHURCH, INC.; TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY HOLINESS TABERNACLE CHURCH, INC. d/b/a ARM FULL OF HELP; and TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY HOLINESS TABERNACLE CHURCH, INC. d/b/a GLORYLAND CHRISTIAN CHURCH DEFENDANTS and VANESSA GRIFFIN; MARCUS GRIFFIN; BROOKLYNN HOWARD; ALSANDRA REID; ALFONSO REID; ANGELA ONDRISEK; NICHOLAS BRODERICK; MATTHEW BRODERICK; MARISSA BRODERICK; SHAINA BRODERICK; NATHAN GRIFFIN, by and through his next friend Tonia Griffin; and ALEXIS BRODERICK, by and through her next friend Sheldon Griffins DEFENDANT-CLAIMANTS ORDER Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. ECF No. 43. The parties notify the Court that this matter has been fully settled and compromised. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the Motion is GRANTED, and all claims in this matter are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. If any party desires that the terms of settlement be a part of the record therein, those terms should be reduced to writing and filed with the court within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the terms of the settlement agreement. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 30th day of August, 2017. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?