Townsend v. AutoZone Stores, LLC et al

Filing 98

JUDGMENT granting 73 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 50 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying as moot 90 Motion to Continue. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on October 12, 2017. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION JOSEPH TOWNSEND v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:16-cv-4036 AUTOZONE STORES, LLC; and RANDY MAGNESS DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants AutoZone Stores, LLC, (“AutoZone Stores”) and Randy Magness (“Magness”). ECF No. 73. Plaintiff Joseph Townsend (“Townsend”) has filed a response. ECF Nos. 83 and 86. Defendants have filed a reply. ECF No. 89. In addition, Defendants have filed a motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927. ECF No. 73. Townsend has responded to that motion (ECF Nos. 83 and 86), and Defendants have filed a reply. ECF No. 89. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 12th day of October, 2017. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?