Solomon v. Southern Health Partners et al
ORDER giving Plaintiff until 8/11/2017 to file a Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on July 11, 2017. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CLIFTON ORLANDO SOLOMAN
Civil No. 4:16-cv-04038
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS;
STEVEN KING; and BRITTANY
Plaintiff Clifton Orlando Soloman filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pro se on April 22,
2016. ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Response to Order to Show Cause in which he
requests an extension of time to respond to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No.
On April 14, 2017, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 40. On
May 12, 2017, I entered an Order directing Plaintiff to file a Response to Defendants’ motion on
or before June 9, 2017. ECF No. 45. On June 29, 2017, I entered an Order to Plaintiff to show
cause as to why Plaintiff failed to file a Response by June 9, 2017. ECF No. 47. Plaintiff has
responded to the Order to show cause and has requested an extension of time to respond to
Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 49.
I find good cause is shown for an extension, the request is not intended for the purpose of
harassment or delay, and neither party will be prejudiced by the extension. Plaintiff’s Motion for
Extension (ECF No. 49) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is given an extension until August 11, 2017,
to file a Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Failure to respond within
the required period of time may subject this matter to dismissal for failure to comply with a
IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of July 2017.
/s/ Barry A. Bryant________
HON. BARRY A. BRYANT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?