Perkins v. Kaimichi Railroad Company, LLC et al
Filing
21
ORDER denying as moot 15 Motion to Quash. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on February 9, 2017. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
RONALD C. PERKINS, JR., Individually
and as the Personal Representative of
THE ESTATE OF VELMA MARIE PERKINS
v.
PLAINTIFF
Civil No. 4:16-cv-04043
KAIMICHI RAILROAD COMPANY, LLC,
and JOHN DOES Numbers 1 through 5, inclusive
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
BEFORE the Court is the Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoenas and for Protective Order
of Domtar A.W. LLC.1 ECF No. 15. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1) and (3)
(2005), United States District Judge Susan O. Hickey referred this Motion to the undersigned for
decision. The Court having reviewed the pleadings and based upon statements from counsel finds
the Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoenas and for Protective Order of Domtar A.W. LLC (ECF No.
15), should be DENIED AS MOOT.
Following the filing of the Motion, counsel for all parties have informed the Court, by
email, that all discovery matters at issue in the instant Motion have been resolved. Based upon
this, Domtar A.W. LLC no longer desires to pursue this Motion.
Accordingly, the Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoenas and for Protective Order of Domtar
A.W. LLC (ECF No. 15) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of February 2017.
/s/ Barry A. Bryant
HON. BARRY A. BRYANT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
Domtar A.W. LLC is not a party to this case, rather it was a subject of discovery requests from
both parties.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?