Perkins v. Kaimichi Railroad Company, LLC et al

Filing 21

ORDER denying as moot 15 Motion to Quash. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on February 9, 2017. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION RONALD C. PERKINS, JR., Individually and as the Personal Representative of THE ESTATE OF VELMA MARIE PERKINS v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 4:16-cv-04043 KAIMICHI RAILROAD COMPANY, LLC, and JOHN DOES Numbers 1 through 5, inclusive DEFENDANTS ORDER BEFORE the Court is the Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoenas and for Protective Order of Domtar A.W. LLC.1 ECF No. 15. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1) and (3) (2005), United States District Judge Susan O. Hickey referred this Motion to the undersigned for decision. The Court having reviewed the pleadings and based upon statements from counsel finds the Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoenas and for Protective Order of Domtar A.W. LLC (ECF No. 15), should be DENIED AS MOOT. Following the filing of the Motion, counsel for all parties have informed the Court, by email, that all discovery matters at issue in the instant Motion have been resolved. Based upon this, Domtar A.W. LLC no longer desires to pursue this Motion. Accordingly, the Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoenas and for Protective Order of Domtar A.W. LLC (ECF No. 15) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of February 2017. /s/ Barry A. Bryant HON. BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 Domtar A.W. LLC is not a party to this case, rather it was a subject of discovery requests from both parties.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?