Bledsoe v. McDowel et al

Filing 27

ORDER denying as moot 25 Motion to Quash. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on November 9, 2016. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION BILLY JOE BLEDSOE v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 4:16-cv-04057 OFFICER BOBBIE McDOWEL, Southwest Arkansas Community Correction Center; And WARDEN STEPHEN ARNOLD DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff proceeds in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pro se and in forma pauperis. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash. ECF No. 25. Plaintiff seeks to quash his previous “Motion to Suppress All Evedience” (ECF No. 18) because Plaintiff thought “suppression” meant to hold. After reviewing the Motion to Suppress (ECF No. 18), the clerk’s office docketed the pleading as a motion to compel in light of Plaintiff’s allegations in his Complaint relating to excessive force and sexual assault. This Court denied Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 18) because Plaintiff had not first conferred or attempted to confer with the defendants to obtain the requested information. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash (ECF No. 25) is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of November 2016. /s/ Barry A. Bryant________ HON. BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?