Bledsoe v. McDowel et al
ORDER denying as moot 21 Motion to Preserve Evidence. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on November 9, 2016. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
BILLY JOE BLEDSOE
Civil No. 4:16-cv-04057
OFFICER BOBBIE McDOWEL, Southwest
Arkansas Community Correction Center;
And WARDEN STEPHEN ARNOLD
Plaintiff proceeds in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pro se and in forma pauperis. Currently
before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Preserve Evidence. ECF No. 21. Defendants have filed
a response to the Motion. ECF No. 22.
Plaintiff’s Motion seeks assistance from the Court to preserve evidence relating to
Plaintiff’s claim he was sexually assaulted by Defendant McDowel including video footage,
written statements, medical records, and telephone records and recordings between March 28,
2016 and June 1, 2016. ECF No. 21. Defendants responded stating they would not destroy any
evidence relevant to Plaintiff’s claim and the items listed in Plaintiff’s Motion “either do not exist,
are unidentifiable based on Plaintiff’s description, or are not in the possession of the Defendants”.
ECF No. 22.
On November 3, 2016 I entered an Initial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 23) requiring
Defendants by December 18, 2016, to preserve “incident reports documenting incidents
referenced in Plaintiff’s complaint, including any color photographs, and/or video footage of the
same, and copies of all medical requests, grievances, and/or photographs in Plaintiff’s file, as
well as any written policies which relate to the facts recited in Plaintiff’s complaint”. To the
extent any of these items exist Defendants must preserve the evidence. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s
Motion to Preserve Evidence (ECF No. 21) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of November 2016.
/s/ Barry A. Bryant________
HON. BARRY A. BRYANT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?