Dillihunt v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on April 17, 2017. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JANARIO D. DILLIHUNT
Civil No. 4:16-cv-04115
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
On April 12, 2017, Defendant filed an Unopposed Motion to Remand. ECF No. 12.1
Defendant states she has contacted Plaintiff’s counsel who does not oppose the motion. Id. The
parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge to conduct any and all proceedings
in this case, including conducting the trial, ordering the entry of a final judgment, and conducting
all post-judgment proceedings. ECF No. 5. Pursuant to this authority, the Court issues this
memorandum opinion and orders the entry of a final judgment in this matter.
Defendant requests a remand so the Commissioner may conduct further administrative
proceedings. ECF No. 12. This Court finds this motion is well-taken and Defendant’s Unopposed
Motion to Remand (ECF No. 12) should be GRANTED. The Commissioner’s decision is reversed,
and this matter is hereby remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further
proceedings. In addition, the undersigned finds the Plaintiff’s Complaint should be and hereby is
dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may still, however, file a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant
The docket numbers for this case are referenced by the designation “ECF No.” The transcript pages for
this case are referenced by the designation “Tr.”
to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412.
A judgment incorporating these findings will be entered pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure 52 and 58.
ENTERED this 17th day of April 2017.
/s/ Barry A. Bryant
HON. BARRY A. BRYANT
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?