McReynolds v. Glenn et al

Filing 47

ORDER denying 37 Motion for Specialist Examination. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on March 28, 2017. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION BOBBY FRANKLIN MCREYNOLDS v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 4:16-cv-04122 PRESTON GLENN, Jail Administrator, Nevada County Jail; And CHRISTOPHER WATTINGNY, Doctor, Wadley Medical Center DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Bobby Franklin McReynolds proceeds pro se in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Specialist Examination. ECF No. 37. Defendant Wadley Regional Medical Center at Hope (“WRMC”) has filed a Response (ECF No. 43) opposing Plaintiff’s motion. In his motion Plaintiff asks the Court “to order this motion for a specialists examination as so clarification can be observed as to how much & what kind of damage has been done to the cervical spine, right shoulder, & left knee down to left ankle. These regions of Bobby McReynold’s body pertain to this civil action.” ECF No. 37. This case is in the early stages of litigation. One of the defendants Plaintiff’s alleges denied him adequate medical care has not yet been served and a motion to dismiss (ECF No. 38) filed by Defendant WRMC is currently pending. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Specialist Examination (ECF No. 37) is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile his request after all defendants have been served and all motions to dismiss are addressed by the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of March 2017. /s/ Barry A. Bryant HON. BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?