McReynolds v. Glenn et al

Filing 91

ORDER denying 90 Motion to Summons Witnesses. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on January 26, 2018. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION BOBBY FRANKLIN MCREYNOLDS v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 4:16-cv-04122 PRESTON GLENN, Jail Administrator, Nevada County Jail; DR. ELKINS; and SHERIFF DANNY MARTIN DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Bobby Franklin McReynolds proceeds pro se in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Summon Witnesses. (ECF No. 90). Plaintiff filed his Motion to Summon Witnesses on January 25, 2018, In his motion Plaintiff states “I Bobby McRenolds need all witnesses served to be into the Court on the day of the Trail, by the Courts doing so I can defend my suit…” (ECF No. 90, p. 1). Plaintiff’s motion is premature. The Court entered an Initial Scheduling Order on October 27, 2017, setting forth various deadlines for this lawsuit. (ECF No. 79). Pursuant to this Order, discovery must be completed by February 26, 2018, and Defendants have until March 28, 2018, to file motions for summary judgment.1 After the Court rules on all motions for summary judgment, Plaintiff may submit his request for witnesses if there are any issues remaining for trial. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Summon Witnesses (ECF No. 90) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of January 2018. /s/ Barry A. Bryant HON. BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE                                                              1 Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on October 27, 2017, which is currently pending before the Court. (ECF No. 80).  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?