Jordan v. Central Transport, LLC et al

Filing 148

ORDER granting 125 Motion in Limine to Exclude Speculation Regarding Medication Prescribed to Plaintiff. (See Order for specifics.) Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 13, 2019. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION MARQCHELLO JORDAN v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:17-cv-4011 ELMER ENRIQUE VENTURA, and JOHN DOES 1-3 DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Speculation Regarding Medication Prescribed to Plaintiff. (ECF No. 125). Defendant Ventura has filed a response. (ECF No. 142). The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. In the instant motion, Plaintiff states that during the deposition of Dr. Kamal Kabakibou, defense counsel asked various questions regarding Plaintiff’s prescription medications and negative drug tests. Plaintiff further states that he “believes Defendant [Ventura] intends to use this type of questioning to imply that Plaintiff was behaving inappropriately with his prescription medications or illegally reselling the medication.” (ECF No. 125, ¶ 2). Plaintiff asserts that any such implication would be speculative. Accordingly, Plaintiff argues that “Defense counsel should be precluded from eliciting testimony and making argument that would imply Plaintiff was misusing or criminally reselling his prescription medications.” ECF No. 126, p. 2. In his response, Defendant Ventura objects, stating that he “does not intend to make any argument that Plaintiff was misusing or illegally selling [his] medication.” ECF No. 142. Upon consideration, the Court finds that the instant motion should be and hereby is GRANTED insofar as Defendant shall not elicit testimony or make arguments that would imply Plaintiff was misusing or criminally reselling his prescription medications. To the extent Defendant intends to offer evidence of Plaintiff’s prescription medication use and/or drug tests for some other purpose, Defendant is instructed to first approach the bench before offering such evidence. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 13th day of March, 2019. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?