Stanford v. Tallant et al

Filing 11

ORDER denying 10 Motion to Compel. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on October 16, 2017. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION TIMOTHES W. STANFORD v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 4:17-cv-04081 SHIFT SUPERVISOR JANA TALLANT; SHERIFF BRIAN MCJUNKINS, Howard County, Arkansas; and NURSE RHONDA HOWARD, Southwest Arkansas Mental Health DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Timothes W. Stanford filed his Complaint in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pro se on September 19, 2017. ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 10). Defendants have not yet filed their answer in this matter and a timeline has not been set for discovery. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion is premature. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to refer to the Prison Litigation Guide for instructions on how and when to file a motion to compel. Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 10) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of October 2017. /s/ Barry A. Bryant HON. BARRY A. BRYANT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?