Stanford v. Tallant et al
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Dismiss Case (CASE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE). Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on February 14, 2018. (cnn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TIMOTHES W. STANFORD
Civil No. 4:17-cv-04081
SHIFT SUPERVISOR JANA TALLANT;
SHERIFF BRIAN MCJUNKINS, Howard
County, Arkansas; and NURSE RHONDA
HOWARD, Southwest Arkansas Mental Health
This is a civil rights action filed by Plaintiff, Timothes W. Stanford, pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 23).
Plaintiff filed his Complaint and Application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on
September 19, 2017. (ECF Nos. 1, 2). In his Complaint Plaintiff named Jana Tallant, Sheriff
Brian McJunkins, and Nurse Rhonda Howard as Defendants. Plaintiff’s application to proceed
IFP was granted on September 20, 2017, and the Court ordered service on Defendants. (ECF Nos.
6, 7). Defendants Tallant and McJunkins filed their Answer on October 19, 2017. (ECF No. 13).
Defendant Howard filed her Answer on November 1, 2017. (ECF No. 21).
Plaintiff filed a Motion to Dismiss his Complaint on November 21, 2017, stating “I was
assaulted by an inmate . . . on 11-15-17 and taken to the hospital. . . . I believe it will be a good
idea to wait until I can attain or retain an attorney. . . . I also believe it will be a good idea to wait
on pursuing this civil suit until I can get or have access to a law library and copying machine.”
(ECF No. 23).
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide an avenue for parties to voluntarily dismiss
claims without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. Defendants have not objected to Plaintiff’s
Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 14th day of February, 2018.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?