Proctor v. King, et al

Filing 31

JUDGMENT granting 20 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 10, 2019. (mll)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION CECIL WAYNE PROCTOR v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:18-cv-4029 STEVEN KING and CHELSEY FOSTER DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Before the Court is Defendants Steven King and Chelsey Foster’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 20). Plaintiff Cecil Wayne Proctor has filed a response. (ECF No. 29). Defendants have not filed a reply and their time to do so has passed. See Local Rule 7.2(b). The Court finds the matter ripe for consideration. For the reasons stated in the Court’s memorandum opinion of even date, the Court finds that Defendants Steven King and Chelsey Foster’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20) should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 10th day of January, 2019. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?