Proctor v. King, et al
JUDGMENT granting 20 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on January 10, 2019. (mll)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CECIL WAYNE PROCTOR
Case No. 4:18-cv-4029
STEVEN KING and CHELSEY
Before the Court is Defendants Steven King and Chelsey Foster’s Motion for Summary
Judgment. (ECF No. 20). Plaintiff Cecil Wayne Proctor has filed a response. (ECF No. 29).
Defendants have not filed a reply and their time to do so has passed. See Local Rule 7.2(b). The
Court finds the matter ripe for consideration.
For the reasons stated in the Court’s memorandum opinion of even date, the Court finds
that Defendants Steven King and Chelsey Foster’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20)
should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 10th day of January, 2019.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?