Pugh v. Tim Helder

Filing 31

ORDER directing defendant to file motion for summary judgment by 9/21/07. Signed by Judge James R. Marschewski on July 3, 2007. (ct)

Download PDF
Pugh v. Tim Helder Doc. 31 Case 5:06-cv-05114-JLH-JRM Document 31 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WE S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FA Y E T T E V ILLE DIVISION G A R Y LaMON PUGH v. DR. HOWARD C iv il No. 06-5114 PLAINTIFF D E FE N D A N T ORDER B y order entered on March 15, 2007 (Doc. 23), the defendant was directed to file a s u m m a r y judgment motion by June 8, 2007. However, prior to the defendant filing his summary ju d gm e n t motion, this case was dismissed based on the plaintiff's failure to prosecute the action a n d keep the court informed of his current address and phone number (Doc. 27). O n June 21, 2007, the plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the dismissal (Doc. 29). The m o tio n was granted (Doc. 30) and the case reopened. Accordingly, the court hereby directs the d e fe n d a n t to file a summary judgment motion by September 21, 2007. Once the summary j u d g m e n t motion is filed, the court will prepare a questionnaire to assist the plaintiff in re s p o n d in g to the motion. For this reason, plaintiff is directed not to respond to the motion for s u m m a r y judgment until so ordered by the court. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of July 2007. /s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -1 - AO72A (Rev. 8/82) Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?