Blount v. Echols et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 22 ; granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Carlton, Hunter Petray, Carter, Echols, as set out in the order. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on September 24, 2008. (ct)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS F A Y E T T E V I L L E DIVISION C H R I S T O P H E R DON BLOUNT v. C i v i l No. 07-5046 P L AI N TI F F
S G T . ECHOLS; PVT. CARLTON; L T . CARTER; and CAPTAIN HUNTER PETRAY, all of the B e n t o n County Detention Center O R DE R Now on this 24th day of September, 2008,
c o n s i d e r a t i o n the Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable J a m e s Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western D i s t r i c t of Arkansas, (Doc. 22), to which there are no objections. T h e Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the R e p o r t And Recommendation is sound in all respects, and should be a d o p t e d in its entirety. I T IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary j u d g m e n t (document #14) should be granted in part and denied in part a s follows: * t h e motion is granted with respect to the plaintiff's
e x c e s s i v e force and retaliation claims; and * t h e motion is denied with respect to the plaintiff's
c l a i m that his religious rights under the Free Exercise Clause of t h e First Amendment were violated. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren JIMM LARRY HENDREN U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?