Sims et al v. Menu Foods Income Fund et al

Filing 11

Attachment 3
REPLY to Response to Motion re 7 MOTION to Stay filed by Menu Foods Holdings, Inc., Menu Foods Income Fund, Menu Foods Midwest Corporation, Menu Foods South Dakota Inc., Menu Foods, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff Sims MDL Motion# 2 Exhibit B - Cooper - AR# 3 Exhibit C - Hearing Order 5-31-07)(Comstock, Christy)

Download PDF
Sims et al v. Menu Foods Income Fund et al Doc. 11 Att. 3 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 40 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION CHAIRMAN: Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges United States District Court Middle District of Florida MEMBERS: Judge D. Lowell Jensen United States District Court Northern District of California Judge J. Frederick Motz United States District Court District of Maryland Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr. United States District Court Northern District of Indiana Judge Kathryn H. Vratil United States District Court District of Kansas Judge David R. Hansen United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit Judge Anthony J. Scirica United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit DIRECT REPLY TO: Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel One Columbus Circle, NE Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building Room G-255, North Lobby Washington, D.C. 20002 Telephone: [202] 502-2800 Fax: [202] 502-2888 http://www.jpml.uscourts.gov April 12, 2007 NOTICE OF HEARING SESSION Dear Counsel: Pursuant to the order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation filed today, you are hereby notified that a hearing session has been scheduled to consider various matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. DATE OF HEARING SESSION: LOCATION OF HEARING SESSION: May 31, 2007 Lloyd D. George United States Courthouse Courtroom 7C, 7th Floor 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 TIME OF HEARING SESSION: In those matters designated for oral argument, counsel presenting oral argument must be present at 8:30 a.m. in order for the Panel to allocate the amount of time for oral argument. Oral argument will commence at 9:30 a.m. Please direct your attention to the enclosed Hearing Session Order and Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session for a listing of the matters scheduled for consideration at this hearing session. · · Section A of this Schedule lists the matters designated for oral argument. Section B of this Schedule lists the matters that the Panel has determined to consider without oral argument, pursuant to Rule 16.1(c), R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 439 (2001). For those matters listed on Section A of the Schedule, the enclosed blue "Notice of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument" must be returned to this office no later than May 14, 2007. Note the procedures governing Panel oral argument which are outlined on the enclosed "Procedures for Oral Argument before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation." These procedures are strictly adhered to and your cooperation is appreciated. Very truly, Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel c: Clerk, U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 40 JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FILED APRIL 12, 2007 JEFFERY N. LÜTHI CLERK OF THE PANEL BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION WM. TERRELL HODGES, CHAIRMAN, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN AND ANTHONY J. SCIRICA, JUDGES OF THE PANEL HEARING SESSION ORDER IT IS ORDERED that on May 31, 2007, a hearing session will be held in Las Vegas, Nevada, to consider the matters on the attached Schedule under 28 U.S.C. § 1407. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that at said hearing session the Panel may, on its own initiative, consider transfer of any or all of the actions in those matters to any district or districts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that at said hearing session the matters listed on Section A of the attached Schedule shall be designated for oral argument. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that at said hearing session the matters listed on Section B of the attached Schedule shall be considered without oral argument, pursuant to Rule 16.1(c), R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 439 (2001). The Panel reserves the prerogative, on any basis including submissions of parties pursuant to Panel Rule 16.1(b), to issue a subsequent notice designating any of those matters for oral argument. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation shall direct notice of this hearing session to counsel for all parties involved in the matters on the attached Schedule. FOR THE PANEL: Wm. Terrell Hodges Chairman Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 3 of 40 SCHEDULE OF MATTERS FOR HEARING SESSION May 31, 2007 -- Las Vegas, Nevada SECTION A MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT MDL-1835 -- In re Brian L. Roberts Litigation Motion of plaintiff Brian L. Roberts for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York: Southern District of New York Brian L. Roberts v. Sony Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:06-6337 District of Utah Brian L. Roberts v. Sony, et al., C.A. No. 2:04-673 MDL-1836 -- In re Mirapex Products Liability Litigation Motion of defendants Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Pfizer Inc. for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York or, in the alternative, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut or other suitable United States district court: Northern District of California Therese Bottiglieri v. Pfizer Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:06-3248 District of Maryland William David Livingston, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:06-1887 District of Minnesota Gary Selinsky, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-873 Robert M. Zwayer, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-874 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 4 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 2 MDL-1836 (Continued) District of Minnesota (Continued) Michael A. Dubaich, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-875 Donald J. Nelsen v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-876 Larry Webb, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-898 Timothy Harms v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-899 Timothy L. Estep v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-900 Mary Conway v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-901 Dennis M. Scharpen, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-1206 Gary E. Charbonneau, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-1215 Todd R. Cain v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-1582 Manuel A. Quintela, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-1675 Thaddeus R. Fayard v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-2144 Hylton H. Dodd v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-2145 Michael W. Averitt, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-2194 William F. Courtney, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-2546 Richard I. Bloom, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-2577 Joyce A. Anderson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-2578 Kathleen R. Frye, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-2662 Cynthia Harris, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3009 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 5 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 3 MDL-1836 (Continued) District of Minnesota (Continued) Daniel M. Hayward, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3180 Daniel F. Neal v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3182 Peggy J. Bronson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3254 Theresa R. Seaman, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3255 Madeline J. Vingers v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3284 Irene M. Conejo v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3519 Melody S. Erickson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3526 Alan Kite, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3527 George P. Wagner v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3537 Gordon J. Haughey, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3539 Stella C. Rush, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3544 Carl M. Milam, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3778 Floyd Wayne Kanuch v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-3839 Rick James Berger v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4358 Mark Mayer v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4366 Resa King, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4502 George Konrad v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4699 Steven Purser, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4783 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 6 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 4 MDL-1836 (Continued) District of Minnesota (Continued) Barbara Goldman, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4784 James Holmes, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4785 Florene D. Saracco v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4827 Greg Stutz v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4828 Thomas M. Celorie v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4868 Maryann J. Deleo, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4869 William Chamberlain, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4870 Ronald P. Markel, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4871 Hilarie Pearce v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4944 Linda Michels, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4945 David Emery, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4946 Richard Scott Brown v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4947 William Gage, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4948 Carolyn Paulette Shows, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-4949 Michele C. Glancy, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:06-5123 Tza Ping Aliya Lee, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:07-39 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 7 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 5 MDL-1836 (Continued) Western District of Missouri Wayne Jackson, et al. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 4:06-969 Western District of Washington Matthew Andresen, et al. v. Pfizer Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-1413 MDL-1837 -- In re BMW Subframe Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation Motion of plaintiff Scott Halperin for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey: Central District of California Eric Bacca, et al. v. BMW of North America, LLC, C.A. No. 2:06-6753 Middle District of Florida Frances Perrone v. BMW of North America, LLC, C.A. No. 8:06-2045 Southern District of Mississippi Jaime Moore v. BMW of North America, LLC, C.A. No. 4:06-139 District of New Jersey Lyndsay Alpert, et al. v. BMW of North America, LLC, C.A. No. 2:06-5198 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 8 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 6 MDL-1838 -- In re TJX Companies, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation Motion of plaintiffs Julie Buckley, et al., for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts: Northern District of Alabama Jo Wood, et al. v. TJX, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-147 District of Massachusetts Paula G. Mace v. TJX Companies, Inc., C.A. No. 1:07-10162 Amerifirst Bank v. TJX Companies, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:07-10169 Julie Buckley, et al. v. TJX Companies, Inc., C.A. No. 1:07-10209 Thomas J. Gaydos v. TJX Companies, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:07-10217 District of Puerto Rico Patricia Miranda, et al. v. TJX, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-1075 MDL-1839 -- In re Pro Tem Partners, Inc., and Semico Research Corp. Contract Litigation Motion of Pro Tem Partners, Inc., for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts: District of Arizona Semico Research Corp. v. Jan-Charles Fine, et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2475 District of Massachusetts Pro Tem Partners, Inc. v. Semico Research Corp., C.A. No. 1:05-11822 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 9 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 7 MDL-1840 -- In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litigation Motion of defendants Exxon Mobil Corp.; Hess Corp.; and Motiva Enterprises LLC for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey: Northern District of California Mark Rushing, et al. v. Alon USA, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:06-7621 District of Kansas Zachary Wilson, et al. v. Ampride, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2582 American Fiber & Cabling LLC., et al. v. BP Corp. North America, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-2053 Western District of Kentucky Keen Exploration, LLC, et al. v. Amoco Oil Co., et al., C.A. No. 5:07-14 Western District of Missouri Victor VanDyne v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-4302 Ditzfeld Transfer, Inc. v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-4025 James Vanderbilt v. BP Corp. North America, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 4:06-1052 Brent Donaldson, et al. v. BP Corp. North America, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 4:07-93 District of New Jersey Richard Galauski, et al. v. Amerada Hess Corp., et al., C.A. No. 3:06-6005 Western District of Oklahoma Craig Massey, et al. v. BP Corp. North America, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 5:07-102 Cynthia J. Cary, et al. v. BP Corp. North America, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 5:07-155 Western District of Tennessee Diane Foster, et al. v. BP North America Petroleum, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-2059 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 10 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 8 MDL-1841 -- In re Wells Fargo Loan Processor Overtime Pay Litigation Motion of defendant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas: Northern District of California Mary Basore, et al. v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, et al., C.A. No. 3:07-461 District of Kansas Trudy Bowne, et al. v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, C.A. No. 2:06-2020 MDL-1842 -- In re Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liabitity Litigation Motion of plaintiffs Sonia Montiel, et al., for centralization of certain of the following actions in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island and motion of plaintiffs Lilyan Kathleen Hall, et al., for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama: Northern District of Alabama Lilyan Kathleen Hall, et al. v. Davol, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-480 Eastern District of Arkansas Carolene Jean Carter v. Davol, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 4:06-1012 Western District of Arkansas Mary Jane Campbell v. Davol, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 5:06-5154 Eastern District of California Daniel Poston, et al. v. Davol, Inc., C.A. No. 2:07-32 Northern District of Florida Jane R. Wilson v. Davol, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:06-541 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 11 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 9 MDL-1842 (Continued) Central District of Illinois James Daniel Mathien v. Davol, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-2031 Eastern District of Missouri Timothy J. Edgar v. Davol, Inc., C.A. No. 4:06-1471 District of New Jersey Jenine Von Essen v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-4786 Eastern District of New York Thomas D. Hyland, et al. v. Davol, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-1054 Southern District of New York Sophia Katechis, et al. v. Davol, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:07-2098 Northern District of Ohio Richard H. Sayler, et al. v. Davol, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:07-765 District of Rhode Island Sonia Montiel, et al. v. Davol, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:07-64 Middle District of Tennessee George Andrew Luffman v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-243 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 12 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 10 MDL-1843 -- In re Schering Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation Motion of plaintiff United American Insurance Company for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania: District of New Jersey International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local No. 331 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Schering-Plough Corp., C.A. No. 2:06-5774 Eastern District of Pennsylvania Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama v. Schering-Plough Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-568 United American Insurance Co. v. Schering-Plough Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-702 MDL-1844 -- In re Air Crash Near Peixoto de Azeveda, Brazil, on September 29, 2006 Motion of plaintiff Zita Swensson de Mattos for centralization of the following actions in a single United States district court: Central District of California Maria Jose Miranda Bermudes Abreu, et al. v. ExcelAire Service, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-1296 Middle District of Florida Suely de Castro Alves Miranda, etc. v. Joseph Lepore, et al., C.A. No. 6:07-283 Eastern District of Missouri Bianca Pi Hancock, etc. v. ExcelAire Services, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 4:07-372 Eastern District of New York Patricia Abrahim Barbosa Garcia, et al. v. ExcelAire Service, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:06-5964 Mario De Abreu Lleras, et al. v. ExcelAire Service, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-6083 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 13 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 11 MDL-1844 (Continued) Southern District of New York Zita Swensson de Mattos, etc. v. ExcelAire Services, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:07-948 MDL-1845 -- In re ConAgra Peanut Butter Products Liability Litigation Motion of plaintiffs Grady Ware, et al., for centralization of certain of the following actions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; motion of plaintiffs Thomas B. Price, Annie Blackwell, and Jamie S. Jeffords for centralization of certain of the following actions in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina; and motion of plaintiff Pamela Gateley, etc., for centralization of certain of the following actions in a single United States district court: Middle District of Florida Marion Caldarera v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 8:07-384 Southern District of Florida Charles Stafford v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 9:07-80178 Middle District of Georgia Karen Klepsig, et al. v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 1:07-37 Geoffrey Midler v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 1:07-42 Northern District of Georgia Anne Cease, et al. v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 1:07-425 John Harper v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 1:07-538 Grady Ware, et al. v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 4:07-40 Northern District of Mississippi Pamela Gateley, etc. v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 2:07-35 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 14 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 12 MDL-1845 (Continued) Western District of Missouri Brian Cox, et al. v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 5:07-6027 Western District of New York Mark Avalone, et al. v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 6:07-6084 Eastern District of Oklahoma Irene Clandord v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 6:07-56 Eastern District of Pennsylvania Lucille A. Knight v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 2:07-818 Middle District of Pennsylvania Kathleen Nieves, et al. v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 3:07-327 District of South Carolina Annie Blackwell v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 0:07-529 Thomas B. Price v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 3:07-536 Jerry Shawn Medford v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 3:07-611 Jamie S. Jeffords v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 4:07-530 Jennifer Ann Hoey, et al. v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 7:07-544 Eastern District of Tennessee Cynthia Woodlee, et al. v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 4:07-15 Western District of Washington James Winston Daniels, II, et al. v. ConAgra, Inc., C.A. No. 2:07-259 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 15 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 13 MDL-1846 -- In re Trade Partners, Inc., Investors Litigation Motion of defendants Macatawa Bank Corp. and Macatawa Bank for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan or, in the alternative, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma: Central District of California James Lee, et al. v. Macatawa Bank Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-8009 Western District of Michigan Forrest W. Jenkins, et al. v. Macatawa Bank Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:03-321 Western District of Oklahoma Steven M. Adamson, et al. v. Macatawa Bank Corp., et al., C.A. No. 5:06-1267 Eddie Elkins, et al. v. Macatawa Bank Corp., C.A. No. 5:07-109 Northern District of Texas Frank V. Bailey, et al. v. Macatawa Bank Corp., C.A. No. 3:06-2193 MDL-1847 -- In re Tayssoun Transportation, Inc., and Dallas & Mavis Specialized Carrier Co., LLC, Contract Litigation Motion of plaintiff Tayssoun Transportation, Inc., for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas: Northern District of Texas Dallas & Mavis Specialized Carrier Co., LLC v. Pacific Motor Transport Co., et al., C.A. No. 3:06-1922 Southern District of Texas Tayssoun Transportation, Inc. v. Dallas & Mavis Specialized Carrier Co., LLC, C.A. No. 4:06-3463 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 16 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 14 MDL-1848 -- In re Rembrandt Technologies, LP, Patent Litigation Motion of defendant CoxCom, Inc., for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware: District of Delaware Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Cablevision Systems Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:06-635 Coxcom, Inc. v. Rembrandt Technologies, LP, C.A. No. 1:06-721 Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. CBS Corp., C.A. No. 1:06-727 Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. NBC Universal, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-729 Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. ABC, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-730 Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 1:06-731 Southern District of New York Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Adelphia Communications Corp., et al., Bky. Advy. No. 1:06-1739 Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Adelphia Communications Corp., C.A. No. 1:07-214 Eastern District of Texas Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Comcast Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:05-443 Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Sharp Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-47 Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Charter Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-223 Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., C.A. No. 2:06-224 Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., C.A. No. 2:06-369 Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Comcast Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-506 Rembrandt Technologies, LP v. Charter Communications, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-507 MDL-1849 -- In re C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., Overtime Pay Litigation Motion of plaintiffs for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois or, in the alternative, the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota: Northern District of Alabama Donna Eddy, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 2:06-4926 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 17 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 15 MDL-1849 (Continued) Central District of California Mimi Vuong v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 2:07-1428 Nancy Austin, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 8:07-301 Eastern District of California Gladys Garcia, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:07-157 Northern District of California Kimberly Elam, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 4:07-475 Northern District of Georgia Terri Kuvach, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:07-328 Northern District of Illinois Evelyn Sparks, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6461 Cheryl D. Braithwaite, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6462 Lynn A. Amorose, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6463 Angela L. Jacobson v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6465 Scott D. Hyder, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6503 Anne K. Ciaglia, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6507 Joann M. McGill, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6510 Richard Cahn, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6512 Jason K. Bergquist, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6515 Craig Bowen, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6516 Christopher L. Sims, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6520 Shannon D. Anderson, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6527 Nora Hageman, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6530 Brenda Mitchell, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6538 Lynette DiNova, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6545 Joanna Elke, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6552 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 18 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 16 MDL-1849 (Continued) Northern District of Illinois (Continued) Roy Rogenic, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6553 LaToya R. McCants, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6556 Michael Blackburn v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6563 Sharon K. Dodson-McDonald, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6564 Patricia A. Parrish, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6568 Brendan M. Clarke, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6581 Amber Vandersommen, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6582 Leslie Nemelka, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6623 Kari S. Johnson, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6629 Ariel B. Crotty, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6630 Wendy L. Ferger, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6632 Laura J. Jeneault, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6634 Heidi Michelle Poepsel v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 1:06-6664 Southern District of Indiana Catherine A. Wilcox v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 3:06-197 District of Kansas Kimberly K. Bethel, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 2:07-2129 Lisa M. Quigley, et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 6:07-1063 Eastern District of Louisiana Morgan J. Wood, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 2:07-1269 Eastern District of Michigan Carla M. Strugala v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 5:07-10767 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 19 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 17 MDL-1849 (Continued) District of Minnesota Jamie L. Benner, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4640 Justin Accola, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4643 Jeffrey Cichosz, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4644 William F. Holmberg, Jr. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4645 Elizabeth Marianne Buck, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4646 Penny M. Cantazaro, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4647 Kathy Cota, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4648 Jill K. East, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4649 Kathleen L. Hambleton, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4650 Elizabeth Hopp v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4651 Joann F. Larson v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4652 Kelley S. Lyons, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4653 Kimberly M. Martineau, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4654 Sandra Steinmetz, et al. v.C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4655 John Gino Giovannoni v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:06-4960 Sally J. Dowden, et al., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:07-89 Amelia M. Alfaro, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:07-90 Jennifer L. Alfano, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:07-251 Claudia Alicia Martinez, et al. v.C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:07-542 Jennifer N. Mcinnis v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:07-544 Beth Shaw, et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:07-595 Shannon Davis v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:07-1119 Esther Nevarez, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 0:07-1563 Eastern District of Missouri Heather Lee Markle, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 4:07-428 Northern District of Ohio Julie Gallagher, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 5:07-846 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 20 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 18 MDL-1849 (Continued) Western District of Oklahoma Timothy J. Bumgarner, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 5:07-278 District of Oregon Allison M. Cassie, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 3:07-333 District of South Carolina Rodney Brewer, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 3:06-3595 District of South Dakota Angela K. Smoot v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 4:07-4038 Eastern District of Tennessee Carolyn Baker Hall, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 3:07-46 Eastern District of Texas Aaron Smith, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 4:07-1 Northern District of Texas Stephanie Smith, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 3:07-409 Western District of Texas Adelita Dickson, et al. v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 5:07-186 Eastern District of Wisconsin Kelly K. Hoell v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 2:07-267 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 21 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 19 MDL-1850 -- In re Pet Food Products Liability Litigation Motion of plaintiff Shirley Sexton for centralization of certain of the following actions in the United States District Court for the Central District of California; motion of plaintiff Christina Troiano for centralization of certain of the following actions in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; and motion of plaintiffs Tom Whaley; Stacey Heller, et al.; Audrey Kornelius, et al.; Suzanne E. Johnson, et al.; and Michele Suggett, et al., for centralization of the following actions in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington: Western District of Arkansas Charles Ray Sims, et al. v. Menu Foods Income Fund, et al., C.A. No. 5:07-5053 Richard Scott Widen, et al. v. Menu Foods, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 5:07-5055 Central District of California Shirley Sexton v. Menu Foods Income Fund, et al., C.A. No. 2:07-1958 District of Connecticut Lauri A. Osborne v. Menu Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 3:07-469 Southern District of Florida Christina Troiano v. Menu Foods, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 0:07-60428 Northern District of Illinois Dawn Majerczyk v. Menu Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 1:07-1543 District of New Jersey Jared Workman, et al. v. Menu Foods Ltd., et al., C.A. No. 1:07-1338 Eastern District of Tennessee Lizajean Holt v. Menu Foods, Inc., C.A. No. 3:07-94 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 22 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section A Las Vegas, Nevada p. 20 MDL-1850 (Continued) Western District of Washington Tom Whaley v. Menu Foods, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-411 Stacey Heller, et al. v. Menu Foods, C.A. No. 2:07-453 Audrey Kornelius, et al. v. Menu Foods, C.A. No. 2:07-454 Suzanne E. Johnson, et al. v. Menu Foods, C.A. No. 2:07-455 Michele Suggett, et al. v. Menu Foods, et al., C.A. No. 2:07-457 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 23 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 21 SECTION B MATTERS DESIGNATED FOR CONSIDERATION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT MDL-875 -- In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI) Oppositions of plaintiffs and defendant Rowan Companies, Inc., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania: Western District of Arkansas Eddie Joe Wooten, et al. v. CertainTeed Corp., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-2004 Northern District of California Carla Groce, et al. v. Todd Shipyards Corp., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-241 Geraldine Burton, et al. v. A.W. Chesterton Co., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-702 Southern District of Illinois Jack Franklin v. CSX Transportation, Inc., C.A. No. 3:06-1058 Eastern District of Louisiana Melvin Raymond v. Borden, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-11140 Middle District of Louisiana Teressa Bell, etc. v. Rowan Companies, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:06-785 Aurelie Breau Waguespack, et al. v. Anco Insulations, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:06-965 Western District of Louisiana Daniel Jarrell v. Franks Petroleum, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 6:06-2190 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 24 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 22 MDL-875 (Continued) District of Maryland Linda Hudson, et al. v. Rapid-American Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:06-3319 Southern District of New York Talbot P. Frawley, et al. v. General Electric Co., et al., C.A. No. 1:06-15395 MDL-1335 -- In re Tyco International, Ltd., Securities, Derivative & "ERISA" Litigation Opposition of plaintiffs Scott Davis, et al., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire: Northern District of Illinois Scott Davis, et al. v. Dennis Kozlowski, et al., C.A. No. 1:07-227 MDL-1373 -- In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Tires Products Liability Litigation Opposition of plaintiff Leonie Moise, etc., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana: Middle District of Florida Leonie Moise, etc. v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC, C.A. No. 2:06-675 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 25 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 23 MDL-1373 (Continued) Oppositions of defendants Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC and Ford Motor Company to remand, under 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), of the following action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas: Southern District of Indiana Susan Janssen, etc. v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:04-5811 (W.D. Arkansas, C.A. No. 2:04-2164) MDL-1409 -- In re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Litigation Opposition of plaintiff Kyle Sandera to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York: Northern District of California Kyle Sandera v. Bank of America Corp., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-34 MDL-1456 -- In re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price Litigation Opposition of plaintiff The State of Idaho to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts: District of Idaho State of Idaho v. Abbott Laboratories, C.A. No. 1:07-93 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 26 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 24 MDL-1566 -- In re Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation Motion of defendant Reliant Energy Services, Inc., to transfer the following action to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada: Western District of Wisconsin Arandell Corp., et al. v. Xcel Energy, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-76 MDL-1596 -- In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation Motions of defendant Eli Lilly & Company to transfer the following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York: District of South Carolina Samuel Davis v. Eli Lilly & Co., C.A. No. 3:06-2312 Kimberly J. Johnson, et al. v. Ricardo Jose Fermo, M.D., et al., C.A. No. 4:06-2994 MDL-1604 -- In re Ocwen Federal Bank FSB Mortgage Servicing Litigation Oppositions of plaintiffs Mary Brown; Linda Fleshman; David Waters, Sr., et al.; Donald Moden, et al.; Annette Miranda; and Stanley C. Beardslee, et al., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois: Eastern District of Texas Mary Brown v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 1:07-92 Northern District of Texas Linda Fleshman v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 4:07-108 Western District of Texas David Waters, Sr., et al. v. Ocwen Financial Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:07-61 Donald Moden, et al. v. Ocwen Financial Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:07-62 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 27 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 25 MDL-1604 (Continued) Western District of Texas (Continued) Annette Miranda v. Ocwen Financial Corp., et al., C.A. No. 5:07-34 Stanley C. Beardslee, et al. v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 5:07-137 MDL-1626 -- In re Accutane Products Liability Litigation Opposition of defendant Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida: Eastern District of Pennsylvania Darrell W. Borum, Jr. v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-94 MDL-1657 -- In re Vioxx Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation Oppositions of plaintiffs to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana: Central District of California Ruby Lois Moore Estate, etc. v. Merck & Co., Inc., C.A. No. 2:06-7548 Eastern District of California Mosetta Bernstine v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-34 Katherine Harrison v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-42 James Daniels, Jr. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-48 Barbara Ford-Daniels v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-51 Lynn Franklin v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-57 Irma Franklin v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-58 Carolyn Lee Wilson v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-61 Mary Ann Harris v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-67 John Wilson v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-68 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 28 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 26 MDL-1657 (Continued) Eastern District of California (Continued) Ishmael Haqq v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-73 David Tenn, etc. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-75 Estate of Juanita Battle v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-77 Denise Denison v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-79 Northern District of California Dorothy Shanks v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-65 Stanford Johnson v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-67 Estate of Robert Badke, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-69 Fred Hardin v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-75 Jeffrey Nielsen v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-76 Juliana Nielsen v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-77 Jacquelyn Johnson v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-78 Arthur Shanks v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 4:07-68 Earnestine Hardin v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 4:07-70 Shahla Jaferian v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 5:07-66 Estate of Sandra Ellis v. Merck & Co., Inc., C.A. No. 5:07-74 Nader Jaferian v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 5:07-79 Randolph Dossett v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 5:07-80 Suzanne Dante v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 5:07-81 Southern District of California Genevieve Tadman v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:06-2151 Del Rorer v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-10 Carol Krepp v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-11 Charles Krepp v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-12 Teresa Rorer v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-14 Arlene Purvis v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-15 Northern District of West Virginia Helen Jean Anderson, etc. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 5:06-151 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 29 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 27 MDL-1657 (Continued) Southern District of West Virginia Paul Noe, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-1004 Leota Faye Dickens v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-1005 Madonna Armentrout, etc. v. Rite Aid of West Virginia, Inc., C.A. No. 3:06-1058 MDL-1657 -- In re Vioxx Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation MDL-1699 -- In re Bextra and Celebrex Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation Oppositions of plaintiffs to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in MDL-1657 and to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in MDL-1699: Northern District of Alabama William D. McCluskey, etc. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-232 Eastern District of California Carol Ann Davies, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2768 Lois Hornsby, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2776 Bertha Townsend, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2780 Arthur Bluett, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2787 Lisa Mathews, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2807 Geneva Styles, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2812 Ali Muhilddine, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2814 Elizabeth A. Cochran v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2817 Kevin L. Chaney v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2826 Wendel Vantine, etc. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2851 Barry Dohner, etc. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2853 Jerry Strange v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-2875 Southern District of Illinois Robert J. Smith, Jr., etc. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:06-964 Wilburn Williamson, etc. v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:06-1023 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 30 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 28 MDL-1700 -- In re FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices Litigation (No. II) Opposition of plaintiff Carlos Quintin Gonzalez to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana: Southern District of Florida Carlos Quintin Gonzalez v. FedEx Home Delivery, et al., C.A. No. 1:06-22964 MDL-1708 -- In re Guidant Corp. Implantable Defibrillators Products Liability Litigation Oppositions of plaintiffs Mary Alice Miller, etc., and Estefana Silva, et al., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota: Middle District of Florida Mary Alice Miller, etc. v. Guidant Corp., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-41 Southern District of Texas Estefana Silva, et al. v. Guidant Corp., et al., C.A. No. 7:07-2 MDL-1715 -- In re Ameriquest Mortgage Co. Mortgage Lending Practices Litigation Oppositions of plaintiffs Rodney S. Means and David L. Murphy, et al., and defendants Dream House Mortgage Corp., Northwest Title & Escrow Corp., and Litton Loan Servicing LP to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois: Northern District of Indiana Rodney S. Means v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co., et al., C.A. No. 2:06-409 District of Massachusetts Kelly Ann I. Graham, et al. v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co., et al., C.A. No. 4:06-40195 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 31 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 29 MDL-1715 (Continued) Eastern District of Missouri Paul W. Derda, et al. v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co., et al., C.A. No. 4:06-1649 Eastern District of Texas David L. Murphy, et al. v. Argent Mortgage Co., LLC, C.A. No. 1:06-781 MDL-1718 -- In re Ford Motor Co. Speed Control Deactivation Switch Products Liability Litigation Oppositions of plaintiffs Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, etc.; David Giorgini, et al.; and Oscar Reyes, et al., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan: Middle District of Florida Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., etc. v. Ford Motor Co., Inc., C.A. No. 8:06-2307 Eastern District of Pennsylvania David Giorgini, et al. v. Ford Motor Co., C.A. No. 2:06-968 Southern District of Texas Oscar Reyes, et al. v. Ford Motor Co., et al., C.A. No. 4:07-165 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 32 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 30 MDL-1726 -- In re Medtronic, Inc., Implantable Defibrillators Products Liability Litigation Oppositions of plaintiff Patricia Kavalir and defendant Medtronic, Inc., to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota: Middle District of Florida Hazel E. Ricciotti, etc. v. Medtronic, Inc., C.A. No. 8:07-233 Northern District of Georgia Claudeena Watt-Austin, et al. v. Boston Scientific Corp., et al., C.A. No. 1:07-293 Northern District of Illinois Patricia Kavalir v. Medtronic, Inc., C.A. No. 1:07-835 MDL-1742 -- In re Ortho Evra Products Liability Litigation Opposition of plaintiffs Jacci Morrison, et al., to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio: Northern District of California Jacci Morrison, et al. v. Ortho-McNeil Corp., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-8 MDL-1760 -- In re Aredia and Zometa Products Liability Litigation Oppositions of plaintiffs Joan LeCompte, et al., and Beatrice Rios to transfer of their respective following actions to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee: District of New Jersey Joan LeCompte, et al. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., C.A. No. 2:07-357 Southern District of Texas Beatrice Rios v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., et al., C.A. No. 6:07-2 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 33 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 31 MDL-1763 -- In re Human Tissue Products Liability Litigation Opposition of plaintiff Sherryl Jean Thornton to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey: Northern District of Alabama Sherryl Jean Thornton v. Michael Mastromarino, et al., C.A. No. 1:06-4899 MDL-1781 -- In re Cintas Corp. Overtime Pay Arbitration Litigation Opposition of respondents in all actions to remand, under 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), of the following actions to their respective transferor courts: Northern District of California Cintas Corp. v. Randall M. Cornelius, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5078 (M.D. Alabama, C.A. No. 2:06-227) Cintas Corp. v. Darren Mitchell Anderson, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5079 (N.D. Alabama, C.A. No. 2:06-492) Cintas Corp. v. Ramon J. Baudier, Jr., et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5080 (S.D. Alabama, C.A. No. 1:06-148) Cintas Corp. v. Robert J. Abel, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5081 (D. Arizona, C.A. No. 2:06-693) Cintas Corp. v. Roberto Carlos Alegria, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5082 (C.D. California, C.A. No. 2:06-1750) Cintas Corp. v. Ronald Arvizu, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5083 (E.D. California, C.A. No. 2:06-611) Cintas Corp. v. Daniel E. Ainsworth, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5084 (S.D. California, C.A. No. 3:06-632) Cintas Corp. v. John D. Bickham, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5085 (D. Colorado, C.A. No. 1:06-427) Cintas Corp. v. Eugene Christensen, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5086 (D. Connecticut, C.A. No. 3:06-360) Cintas Corp. v. Charles Leroy Gray, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5087 (D. Delaware, C.A. No. 1:06-162) Cintas Corp. v. Alice Allen, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5088 (M.D. Florida, C.A. No. 8:06-400) Cintas Corp. v. Joseph Frazier, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5089 (N.D. Florida, C.A. No. 3:06-103) Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 34 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 32 MDL-1781 (Continued) Northern District of California (Continued) Cintas Corp. v. David J. Abrahamsen, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5090 (S.D. Florida, C.A. No. 0:06-60310) Cintas Corp. v. Matthew J. DeFelix, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5091 (M.D. Georgia, C.A. No. 1:06-38) Cintas Corp. v. Jeffrey Aybar, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5092 (N.D. Georgia, C.A. No. 1:06-569) Cintas Corp. v. Joe L. Banks, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5093 (S.D. Georgia, C.A. No. 1:06-35) Cintas Corp. v. David DeBilzan, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5094 (D. Idaho, C.A. No. 1:06-104) Cintas Corp. v. James Allen Burress, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5095 (C.D. Illinois, C.A. No. 1:06-1068) Cintas Corp. v. Vince Agozzino, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5096 (N.D. Illinois, C.A. No. 1:06-1343) Cintas Corp. v. James Atkins, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5097 (N.D. Indiana, C.A. No. 2:06-85) Cintas Corp. v. Ryan Albright, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5098 (S.D. Indiana, C.A. No. 1:06-401) Cintas Corp. v. Donald Allen Griffin, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5099 (S.D. Iowa, C.A. No. 4:06-91) Cintas Corp. v. Matthew L. Blackman, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5100 (D. Kansas, C.A. No. 2:06-2091) Cintas Corp. v. Danny L. Brown, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5101 (E.D. Kentucky, C.A. No. 2:06-52) Cintas Corp. v. Jason Agostini, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5102 (W.D. Kentucky, C.A. No. 3:06-131) Cintas Corp. v. Jack Addison, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5103 (E.D. Louisiana, C.A. No. 2:06-1247) Cintas Corp. v. Gustave Fontenot, Jr., et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5104 (M.D. Louisiana, C.A. No. 3:06-188) Cintas Corp. v. Ivan Edward Avery, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5105 (W.D. Louisiana, C.A. No. 6:06-391) Cintas Corp. v. Randall Bowles, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5106 (D. Maine, C.A. No. 2:06-55) Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 35 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 33 MDL-1781 (Continued) Northern District of California (Continued) Cintas Corp. v. Joe Andrews, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5107 (D. Maryland, C.A. No. 8:06-641) Cintas Corp. v. Philip Daniel Blaisdell, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5108 (D. Massachusetts, C.A. No. 1:06-10442) Cintas Corp. v. Brandon Alioto, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5109 (E.D. Michigan, C.A. No. 2:06-11043) Cintas Corp. v. Travis M. Ault, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5110 (W.D. Michigan, C.A. No. 1:06-180) Cintas Corp. v. John Callahan, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5111 (D. Minnesota, C.A. No. 0:06-1012) Cintas Corp. v. Gregory Cole Bigbee, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5112 (S.D. Mississippi, C.A. No. 3:06-137) Cintas Corp. v. Relton Barnes, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5113 (E.D. Missouri, C.A. No. 4:06-450) Cintas Corp. v. Randall Adams, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5114 (W.D. Missouri, C.A. No. 4:06-208) Cintas Corp. v. Jeffrey Anderson, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5115 (D. Nebraska, C.A. No. 8:06-262) Cintas Corp. v. Anthony Dean Hamby, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5116 (D. Nevada, C.A. No. 2:06-300) Cintas Corp. v. Joseph Allen, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5117 (D. New Jersey, C.A. No. 2:06-1164) Cintas Corp. v. Tony L. Bostick, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5119 (D. New Mexico, C.A. No. 1:06-185) Cintas Corp. v. Troy Amott, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5120 (E.D. New York, C.A. No. 1:06-1105) Cintas Corp. v. Hugh J. Kingsley, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5121 (N.D. New York, C.A. No. 5:06-311) Cintas Corp. v. Louis Alves, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5122 (S.D. New York, C.A. No. 1:06-1933) Cintas Corp. v. Robert F. Bowles, Jr., et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5123 (W.D. New York, C.A. No. 6:06-6147) Cintas Corp. v. Matthew Anderson, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5124 (E.D. North Carolina, C.A. No. 5:06-113) Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 36 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 34 MDL-1781 (Continued) Northern District of California (Continued) Cintas Corp. v. Gus Aranegui, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5126 (M.D. North Carolina, C.A. No. 1:06-225) Cintas Corp. v. Jonathan Allred, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5127 (W.D. North Carolina, C.A. No. 3:06-114) Cintas Corp. v. Bradley Agler, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5128 (N.D. Ohio, C.A. No. 3:06-7083) Cintas Corp. v. Donald Adkins, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5129 (S.D. Ohio, C.A. No. 1:06-126) Cintas Corp. v. Robert Hall, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5130 (E.D. Oklahoma, C.A. No. 6:06-97) Cintas Corp. v. Brent Berna, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5131 (N.D. Oklahoma, C.A. No. 4:06-148) Cintas Corp. v. Raymond Mac Harris, Jr., et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5132 (W.D. Oklahoma, C.A. No. 5:06-247) Cintas Corp. v. Dennis Bassett, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5133 (D. Oregon, C.A. No. 6:06-335) Cintas Corp v. Kenneth W. Baptist, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5134 (E.D. Pennsylvania, C.A. No. 2:06-1053) Cintas Corp. v. Brian Ash, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5135 (M.D. Pennsylvania, C.A. No. 3:06-517) Cintas Corp. v. Christopher Derenzo, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5136 (W.D. Pennsylvania, C.A. No. 2:06-324) Cintas Corp. v. Joseph E. Edwards, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5137 (D. Rhode Island, C.A. No. 1:06-112) Cintas Corp. v. Thomas Eugene Alert, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5138 (D. South Carolina, C.A. No. 3:06-762) Cintas Corp. v. Stephen Barlow, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5139 (E.D. Texas, C.A. No. 1:06-137) Cintas Corp. v. Bryan Armstrong, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5140 (N.D. Texas, C.A. No. 3:06-432) Cintas Corp. v. Judd Allen, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5141 (S.D. Texas, C.A. No. 4:06-824) Cintas Corp. v. Issac Anaya, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5142 (W.D. Texas, C.A. No. 5:06-216) Cintas Corp. v. Wade Bell, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5143 (D. Utah, C.A. No. 2:06-205) Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 37 of 40 Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session, Section B Las Vegas, Nevada p. 35 MDL-1781 (Continued) Northern District of California (Continued) Cintas Corp. v. John O. Ansink, Jr., et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5144 (E.D. Virginia, C.A. No. 1:06-267) Cintas Corp. v. Nelson Carter, Jr., C.A. No. 4:06-5145 (W.D. Virginia, C.A. No. 5:06-23) Cintas Corp. v. Scott Burgess, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5146 (E.D. Washington, C.A. No. 2:06-3023) Cintas Corp. v. Michael Anderson, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5147 (W.D. Washington, C.A. No. 2:06-332) Cintas Corp. v. Nathan J. Andree, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5148 (E.D. Wisconsin, C.A. No. 2:06-303) Cintas Corp. v. Chris Brown, et al., C.A. No. 4:06-5149 (W.D. Wisconsin, C.A. No. 3:06-133) MDL-1789 -- In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation Opposition of plaintiff Mary Ellen Potgieter to transfer of the following action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York: District of New Jersey Mary Ellen Potgieter v. Merck & Co., Inc., C.A. No. 2:07-2 Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 38 of 40 PROCEDURES FOR ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION All oral argument is governed by the provisions of Rule 16.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (effective April 2, 2001). Rule 16.1(g) allows a maximum of twenty minutes for oral argument in each matter. In most cases, however, less time is necessary for the expression of all views and the Panel reserves the prerogative of reducing the time requested by counsel. Accordingly, counsel should be careful not to overstate the time requested for oral argument. The Panel insists that counsel limit all oral argument to the appropriate criteria. See generally In re "East of the Rockies" Concrete Pipe Antitrust Cases, 302 F. Supp. 244, 255-56 (J.P.M.L. 1969) (concurring opinion) (discussion concerning criteria for transfer). Rule 16.1 is duplicated in its entirety hereafter for your convenience. Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 39 of 40 RULE 16.1: HEARING SESSIONS AND ORAL ARGUMENT (a) Hearing sessions of the Panel for the presentation of oral argument and consideration of matters taken under submission without oral argument shall be held as ordered by the Panel. The Panel shall convene whenever and wherever desirable or necessary in the judgment of the Chairman. The Chairman shall determine which matters shall be considered at each hearing session and the Clerk of the Panel shall give notice to counsel for all parties involved in the litigation to be so considered of the time, place and subject matter of such hearing session. (b) Each party filing a motion or a response to a motion or order of the Panel under Rules 7.2, 7.3, 7.4 or 7.6 of these Rules may file simultaneously therewith a separate statement limited to one page setting forth reasons why oral argument should, or need not, be heard. Such statements shall be captioned "Reasons Why Oral Argument Should [Need Not] Be Heard," and shall be filed and served in conformity with Rules 5.12 and 5.2 of these Rules. (c) No transfer or remand determination regarding any action pending in the district court shall be made by the Panel when any party timely opposes such transfer or remand unless a hearing session has been held for the presentation of oral argument except that the Panel may dispense with oral argument if it determines that: (i) the dispositive issue(s) have been authoritatively decided; or (ii) the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Unless otherwise ordered by the Panel, all other matters before the Panel, such as a motion for reconsideration, shall be considered and determined upon the basis of the papers filed. (d) In those matters in which oral argument is not scheduled by the Panel, counsel shall be promptly advised. If oral argument is scheduled in a matter the Clerk of the Panel may require counsel for all parties who wish to make or to waive oral argument to file and serve notice to that effect within a stated time in conformity with Rules 5.12 and 5.2 of these Rules. Failure to do so shall be deemed a waiver of oral argument by that party. If oral argument is scheduled but not attended by a party, the matter shall not be rescheduled and that party's position shall be treated as submitted for decision by the Panel on the basis of the papers filed. (e) Except for leave of the Panel on a showing of good cause, only those parties to actions scheduled for oral argument who have filed a motion or written response to a motion or order shall be permitted to appear before the Panel and present oral argument. (f) Counsel for those supporting transfer or remand under Section 1407 and counsel for those opposing such transfer or remand are to confer separately prior to the oral argument for the purpose of organizing their arguments and selecting representatives to present all views without duplication. (g) Unless otherwise ordered by the Panel, a maximum of twenty minutes shall be allotted for oral argument in each matter. The time shall be divided equally among those with varying viewpoints. Counsel for the moving party or parties shall generally be heard first. Case 5:07-cv-05053-JLH Document 11 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 40 of 40 -2(h) So far as practicable and consistent with the purposes of Section 1407, the offering of oral testimony before the Panel shall be avoided. Accordingly, oral testimony shall not be received except upon notice, motion and order of the Panel expressly providing for it. (i) After an action or group of actions has been set for a hearing session, consideration of such action(s) may be continued only by order of the Panel on good cause shown.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?