Widen et al v. Menu Foods et al

Filing 18

NOTICE of Appearance by Leisa B. Pearlman on behalf of Richard Scott Widen, Barbara Widen (Pearlman, Leisa)

Download PDF
Widen et al v. Menu Foods et al Doc. 18 Case 5:07-cv-05055-RTD Document 18 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION RICHARD SCOTT AND BARBARA WIDEN, Individually and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs vs. MENU FOODS; MENU FOODS INCOME FUND; MENU FOODS GEN PAR LIMITED; MENU FOODS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; MENU FOODS OPERAING PARTERNSHIP; MENU FOODS MIDWEST CORP; MENU FOODS SOUTH DAKOTA; MENU FOODS, INC.; MENU FOODS HOLDINGS, INC.; WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendants § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 07-5055 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Comes now Leisa B. Pearlman, of the law firm Patton, Roberts, McWilliams & Capshaw, LLP, and hereby enters her appearance as an attorney of record in this cause on behalf of Plaintiffs, Richard Scott and Barbara Widen, and requests the Clerk of the above named Court to enter the same of record. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Leisa B. Pearlman Leisa B. Pearlman AR State Bar No. 92070 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE ­ Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:07-cv-05055-RTD Document 18 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 2 of 3 PATTON, ROBERTS, MCWILLIAMS & CAPSHAW, L.L.P. 2900 St. Michael Drive, Suite 400 Post Office Box 6128 Texarkana, Texas 75505-6128 Telephone: (903) 334-7000 Facsimile: (903) 334-7007 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE ­ Page 2 Case 5:07-cv-05055-RTD Document 18 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served through electronic filing to all counsel of record on this 16th day of August, 2007. /s/ Leisa B. Pearlman Leisa B. Pearlman NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE ­ Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?