DeShields v. Ferguson et al

Filing 38

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Richard DeShields. Objections to R&R due by 3/16/2009. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on February 26, 2009. (tg) Modified on 3/3/2009 to correct judge (jn).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION RICHARD DeSHIELDS v. SHERIFF KEITH FERGUSON; DET. IVY; NURSE ANDREA CASE NO.: 07-5098 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Richard DeShields (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint (Doc. 1) on May 30, 2007, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. This case has been referred to the undersigned by the Honorable Chief Judge Jimm Larry Hendren for a Report and Recommendation. The Court issued an Order on January 14, 2009, directing Plaintiff to complete and sign a response to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on or before February 16, 2009. (Doc. 37). This deadline has passed and Plaintiff has failed to respond. No mail has been returned to the Court and the Plaintiff has not been in communication with the Court in any way. Accordingly, it is the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the above-styled case be DISMISSED for failure to comply with an Order of the Court, as well as a failure to prosecute the action. The parties have ten (10) days from receipt of this report and recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court. DATED this 26th day of February 2009. /s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?