Avery v. Ferguson et al
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint Referred (42:1983)/ oral motion to voluntarily dismiss certain defendants filed by Robert W. Avery. Objections to R&R due by 9/8/2009. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on August 21, 2009. (tg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
ROBERT W. AVERY v. SHERIFF KEITH FERGUSON, et al. Civil No. 07- 5111
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE On August 18, 2009, the Court held an evidentiary hearing in the above-styled case. At the hearing, Plaintiff made an oral motion before the Court to voluntarily dismiss the following defendants: Srader, Robbins, Warzecha, Chapman, Holland, Conner, and Gage. There was no objection to this motion by the Defendants, and it was noted the dismissals were to be with prejudice. At the time of the hearing, the undersigned noted the dismissals should be granted. Accordingly, it is my recommendation the following Defendants be dismissed from this action, with prejudice, due to the Motion of the Plaintiff: Srader, Robbins, Warzecha, Chapman, Holland, Conner, and Gage. The parties have ten (10) days from receipt of this report and recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court. DATED this 21st day of August, 2009.
/s/ J. Marschewski HON. JAMES R. MARSCHEWSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?