Seratt v. Seratt
ORDER denying 47 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 47 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 3, 2010. (tg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E S T E R N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS F A Y E T T E V I L L E DIVISION R O D G E R SERATT v. T I M O T H Y SERATT ORDER N o w on this 3rd day of March, 2010, comes on for consideration D e f e n d a n t ' s Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees (document #47), and f r o m said motion, the supporting documentation, and the response t h e r e t o , the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. T h e plaintiff brought this diversity action against the The plaintiff alleged that in 1994 C i v i l No. 07-5210 DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
d e f e n d a n t on November 16, 2007.
a n d 1995 he and the defendant entered into multiple unwritten a g r e e m e n t s , in which the plaintiff loaned and/or entrusted funds and personal property to the defendant. According to the
p l a i n t i f f , defendant assured him that the funds and property would b e returned to plaintiff "upon demand." pursuant to the unwritten agreements, Plaintiff alleged that, the defendant owed him
$76,000.00. 2. O n March 6, 2009, the Court granted defendant's Motion
f o r Summary Judgment, finding that plaintiff's claims are barred by t h e statute of limitations, and dismissed plaintiff's claims with prejudice. 3. O n April 29, 2009, the defendant filed the instant motion
f o r attorney's fees.
T h e plaintiff opposes the defendant's motion. A l t h o u g h Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
a n d Rule 54.1 of the Local Rules for the Eastern and Western D i s t r i c t s of Arkansas 1 control motions for attorney's fees, the i n s t a n t motion is made pursuant to Rules 60(a) and 60(b)(6) of the F e d e r a l Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court finds that Rules 60(a) and 60(b)(6) are not the a p p r o p r i a t e rules under which the defendant should have sought a t t o r n e y ' s fees. Further, because the appropriate time period
p r o s c r i b e d by Rule 54 had long since expired prior to the filing of t h e instant motion; and, because the Arkansas statute under which the defendant seeks attorney fees allows for discretionary
a p p l i c a t i o n , the Court finds the motion should be, and hereby is, denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren JIMM LARRY HENDREN U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 Both FRCP 54 and Local Rule 54.1 establish that a motion for attorney's fees shall be filed within fourteen (14) days after the entry of judgment. Further, Local Rule 54.1 provides that "[a] failure to present a timely petition for an award of attorney's fees may be considered by the Court to be a waiver of any claim for attorney's fees." The instant motion, made pursuant to Rule 60, was filed approximately thirty-four (34) days after the entry of judgment.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?