Benjamin v. Chandler et al

Filing 33

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 22 re 1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Michael Benjamin. The following claims are dismissed: the false arrest, malicious prosecution, and false imprisonment claims; all claims against Mayor Dan Coody; and all claims against Sheriff Tim Helder. The remaining claim of Benjamin's illegal search is referred back to Judge Marscheski for a report and recommendation. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on May 1, 2009. Motions referred to James R. Marschewski.(sh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W E S T ER N DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS F A YE T T E V I L L E DIVISION M IC HA E L BENJAMIN v. Ci v i l No. 08-5134 PLAINTIFF O FF IC E R S. CHANDLER, F ay et t e v i l l e Police Department, M AY OR DAN COODY; and S HE RI F F TIM HELDER ORDER DEFENDANTS N o w on this 1st day of May, 2009, comes on for consideration t he Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, James R. M ar sc h e w s k i (document #22, filed March 16, 2009), in this matter, to w hi ch a Response was filed on March 26, 2009. The Court, having c a r e f u l l y reviewed said Report and Recommendation and the Response t he re t o , finds that the Report and Recommendation is sound in all r es pe c t s , and that it should be adopted in toto. I T IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and R ec om m e n d a t i o n is adopted in toto. I T IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the M ag is t r a t e Judge's Report and Recommendation, the following claims a re dismissed: the false arrest, malicious prosecution, and false i mp ri s o n m e n t claims; all claims against Mayor Dan Coody; and all claims against Sheriff Tim Helder. The remaining claim of B en ja m i n ' s illegal search is referred back to Judge Marschewski for a report and recommendation. I T IS SO ORDERED. / s / Ji mm Larry Hendren H O N . JIMM LARRY HENDREN U N I TE D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?