Kendrick v. Ludwig et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting 7 Motion for Reconsideration of the 6 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations filed by Catherynne W. Kendrick. The Court reviews the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendations (attached to the Motion) and reaffirms its prior ruling adopting the Report and Recommendation and dismissing the petitioner's 2241 Petition. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on October 21, 2008. (ct) Modified on 10/22/2008 to change document type (jn).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION CATHERYNNE W. KENDRICK v. No. 08-5152 RESPONDENTS ORDER On August 29, 2008, the Court entered an order (Doc. 6) adopting the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) filed in this case on July 28, 2008, and dismissed the petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition. On September 17, 2008, the petitioner filed a Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 7), requesting the Court to consider her objections (attached to the motion) to the Report and PETITIONER JUDGE STANLEY LUDWIG, et al. Recommendation. Upon due consideration, the petitioner's Motion (Doc. 7) is GRANTED and the Court will consider the petitioner's objections. The Court has reviewed the petitioner's objections and has considered petitioner's this case de novo. The Court law nor finds fact that the objections offer neither requiring departure from the Report and Recommendation. Court reaffirms its prior ruling adopting Accordingly, the the Report and Recommendation and dismissing the petitioner's 2241 petition. IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2008. /S/JIMM LARRY HENDREN JIMM LARRY HENDREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?