Kendrick et al v. Ardnt et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Report and Recommendations. The plaintiff is precluded from filing any future civil action IFP unless she is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. The Clerk of the Court is directed to pro visionally file any new action in which plaintiff seeks to proceed IFP. The magistrate judge shall review the action and unless plaintiff is under imminent danger or serious injury, the magistrate judge will recommend that IFP status be denied. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on May 1, 2009. (src)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION CATHERYNNE W. KENDRICK; RAY YOUNGBLOOD KENDRICK; JERRY TRACKE; and LIONELL NAVARRETTE v. Civil No. 08-5242

PLAINTIFFS

KAREN ROSE ARDNT, Adoptive Parent; JOHN DAVID DUTCHER, Judge; M. BROWN, Agent, Federal Bureau of Investigation; M. BLAIR, Agent, Federal Bureau of Investigation; JOHN DOES 1-3, Deputy United States Marshal; JOHN DOE, Deputy Benton County Sheriff'S Office; JANE DOE, Century Tel Records Department; JOHN DOES 1-2, Investigators, Social Security Administration; MICHAEL SCOTT, Probation Officer, United States Probation Officer; and BEVERLY STITES JONES, United States Magistrate Judge ORDER

DEFENDANTS

Now on this 1st day of May, 2009, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (R&R) issued by the Honorable James Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas (Doc. #5). The Court, being

well and sufficiently advised, finds and orders as follows with respect to the same: 1. R&R. Catherynne W. Kendrick filed objections (Doc. # 6) the

They are without merit and are denied. 2. The Court, having considered the R&R, and the objections,

finds and orders that the R&R should be, and it hereby is adopted in toto.

3.

Accordingly, Catherynne Kendrick's IFP status is revoked

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Further, this matter is dismissed on the grounds that the claims are frivolous and fail to state claims upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii)(IFP action may be dismissed on such grounds at any time). 4. In addition, Ms. Kendrick is ordered to refrain from

filing any future civil action IFP unless she is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Accordingly, the clerk of this

Court is directed to provisionally file any new action in which Catherynne W. Kendrick seeks to proceed IFP. The magistrate judge

shall then review the action and, if it is a civil action rather than a criminal or habeas one, and, if Kendrick has not asserted a valid claim that she is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, the magistrate judge shall recommend that IFP status be denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren JIMM LARRY HENDREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-