Wilmoth v. Lockhart et al

Filing 91

ORDER denying 81 Motion to Dismiss and adopting 88 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on September 15, 2011. (adw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
MICHAEL SHANE WILMOTH
v.

PLAINTIFF
Civil No. 10-5048

DEPUTY LOCKHART ET AL.

DEFENDANT
O R D E R

NOW

on

this

15th

day

of

September

2011,

comes

on

for

consideration the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
(Doc. 88) to which no objections have been filed.

The Court, being

well

the

and

sufficiently

advised,

has

reviewed

Report

and

Recommendation and finds it sound in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of
the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 88) is adopted in toto.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the
Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the Motion to
Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 81) filed by separate defendants
ARAMARK Correctional Services, LLC and Barbara Hardwick, is hereby
denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jimm Larry Hendren
HON. JIMM LARRY HENDREN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE