Wilmoth v. Lockhart et al

Filing 91

ORDER denying 81 Motion to Dismiss and adopting 88 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on September 15, 2011. (adw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION MICHAEL SHANE WILMOTH v. PLAINTIFF Civil No. 10-5048 DEPUTY LOCKHART ET AL. DEFENDANT O R D E R NOW on this 15th day of September 2011, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 88) to which no objections have been filed. The Court, being well the and sufficiently advised, has reviewed Report and Recommendation and finds it sound in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 88) is adopted in toto. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 81) filed by separate defendants ARAMARK Correctional Services, LLC and Barbara Hardwick, is hereby denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Jimm Larry Hendren HON. JIMM LARRY HENDREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?